I wonder if Floyd will ever be the same fighter.

[hugh grant]

Why do you get to disregard Mosley and Marquez? You dont find it strange that its only with Mayweather that its ok to erase certain parts of history? Or that guys (not just Pac) fight the same guys and get pats on the back?

JMM was a good name, but JMM hasnt done anything at 147 to this very day. SSM wasnt a great win, as SSM had lost 5 times already. When Pac fights people who lost once, like Cotto and Hatton there is uproar and furore.

SSM got respect on the basis of beating Margarito but styles make fights and Margarito was taylor made for SSM that night, plus the worries of the plaster. Not the right frame of mind going into the fight.
That is a good win for Floyd but still need answers.

[studentofthegam]

JMM was a good name, but JMM hasnt done anything at 147 to this very day. SSM wasnt a great win, as SSM had lost 5 times already. When Pac fights people who lost once, like Cotto and Hatton there is uproar and furore.

SSM got respect on the basis of beating Margarito but styles make fights and Margarito was taylor made for SSM that night, plus the worries of the plaster. Not the right frame of mind going into the fight.
That is a good win for Floyd but still need answers.

Come on man. That was my problem with Floyd saying that Mosley's 5 losses was an excuse not to fight. How could you quote Floyd's excuse?........ How could you? Didnt Floyd drop Hatton for that 0? Isnt Pac fighting Mosley now with one more loss than in the Mayweather fight? The point is not that you're being critical but that its not consistent. If Floyd's done nothing at 147 then Pac hasnt either. Considering you just discredited SSM win over Margs. You would be better to just come out and say "I hate Mayweather and it has nothing to do with boxing". That has more merit than your explaination.