Originally posted by IMDAZED
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: R. Mayweather Continues The Verbal Bashing of Pacquiao
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by switchsouthpaw View PostYES...I'm consistent. I've said that in every thread which you and I have gone back and forth in. Mayweather can't dictate what a commission should do or is designed to do. Just as teams have owners and a commission, that dictate and enforce policy like a Roger Goodell in the NFL, until that time it's a no go.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAS_JAS View Postdude they are doing OSDT during camp, cut-off is 7 days before the fight. what PED can you use for less than 7 days that will give you a boost and you can flush it out within 7 days because they are going to test them again immediately after the fight?
IMHO, a 7-day cutoff is fine.
3-5 days is actually what Freddie unofficially agreed to before negotiations really started in 2009. Then Roach came up with the first of 6 ridiculous excuses provided by Team Pacquiao as to why Pac would not submit to random blood tests.
" my guy doesn't like needles "..... remember ?
IMHO, testing up to 1 day prior to the fight should be the only concession.
Comment
-
lol peds advocates are at it again. how come these dummies did not criticize andre dirrel for not taking wada testing when he fought arthur abraham? all of abraham's super 6 fights in europe were with wada testing but because his fight against dirrel was held in michigan where the state commission doesn't require it the additional testing was scrapped. and since it's not required, dirrel did not bother to take the additional test. not even a cutoff or **** like that.
and just recently, there were reports saying this wada testing is a major sticking point in the abraham-ward negotiations. makes you wonder how this issues skipped the attention of these peds mongorers.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostIt's not that simple because you keep hopping from one foot to another. How is Roger's argument comparable to your Vargas statement?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by switchsouthpaw View PostJesus Christmas....c'mon I give you to much credit. Roger said that without PED's Pac gets knocked out? I countered by saying Vargas was on PED's and got sparked out. At least my example is grounded in something that actually took place, did it not? Roger's is grounded in his inability to use logic. It's very simple, if my logic is flawed, then so is R.M's.The real issue here is that you can't for the life of you, bring yourself to admit that, because then it would go against everything you've said up until now.
Comment
Comment