Comments Thread For: R. Mayweather Continues The Verbal Bashing of Pacquiao

[IMDAZED]

MMM seriously? If it did help him, then he needs a refund asap.

Why? Did you see his prior performances to that bout? The fight against Oscar was an improvement of immense proportions.

[Pullcounter]

I wasn't implying anything. I simply stated that Vargas tested positive for PED's after the ODLH fight? YES or NO?

Did it prevent him from being sparked out? YES or NO?

So whatever logic Roger is using (god knows planet his brain operates on) what is he referencing to come to those conclusions?

don't argue with *****s... they are trolls and delusional

[IMG]http://i123.***********.com/albums/o286/VespertineIconoclast/*****-haters-gone-hate.gif[/IMG]

[switchsouthpaw]

And, your post had nothing to do with the topic...again.

Let me help you...it had nothing to do with supporting your statements, therefore in your mind it doesn't make sense. That's okay because any statement rebutting your own, fall on def ears. It's called a narrative, yours is clear and you're sticking to it.

To end this now, I was reference R. Mayweather's statements, such as Manny having been stopped twice, and his belief that Manny is on PED's and once he gets off those PED's then he'll be stopped again. I used the Vargas example to rebut that logic, because it doesn't hold water. You were attempting to be ironic when you said Manny doesn't fight for money, hence your reference to Hatton/Pac negotiations? I simply stated in irony that Mayweather doesn't fight for belts (his own words), yet his fans use that line of argument to support his choice in fighting Baldomir.

[switchsouthpaw]

Why? Did you see his prior performances to that bout? The fight against Oscar was an improvement of immense proportions.

So you're argument is that something deemed "unusual" means that someone is on drugs?

[V.WEBB]

Let me help you...it had nothing to do with supporting your statements, therefore in your mind it doesn't make sense. That's okay because any statement rebutting your own, fall on def ears. It's called a narrative, yours is clear and you're sticking to it.

To end this now, I was reference R. Mayweather's statements, such as Manny having been stopped twice, and his belief that Manny is on PED's and once he gets off those PED's then he'll be stopped again. I used the Vargas example to rebut that logic, because it doesn't hold water. You were attempting to be ironic when you said Manny doesn't fight for money, hence your reference to Hatton/Pac negotiations? I simply stated in irony that Mayweather doesn't fight for belts (his own words), yet his fans use that line of argument to support his choice in fighting Baldomir.

Switch your name to switchthesubject.

[switchsouthpaw]

Switch your name to switchthesubject.

Was that your attempt at being witty?

Seriously, all you've managed to do so far is to state the same things over and over. Be specific, ask a question and you get a specific response.

[jrosales13]

So you're argument is that something deemed "unusual" means that someone is on drugs?

Well your argument seems to be PED doesn't enhance performance.

Hence why Vargas got KO'd.

His argument is that PED did enhance Vargas performance against Oscar. Seeing how well and competitive he was against Oscar. Compare to how he performed against the great "Shibata" Flores and Rivera(who dropped Vargas mind you)

[IMDAZED]

So you're argument is that something deemed "unusual" means that someone is on drugs?

No, my argument is that his performance was certainly far better than it had been.

[switchsouthpaw]

Well your argument seems to be PED doesn't enhance performance.

Hence why Vargas got KO'd.

His argument is that PED did enhance Vargas performance against Oscar. Seeing how well and competitive he was against Oscar. Compare to how he performed against the great "Shibata" Flores and Rivera(who dropped Vargas mind you)

Vargas was a good fighter, with or without PED's. For tge last time I'm not arguing anything one way or the other. R. Mayweather offered an unsubstantiated opinion. I offered a counter point, using Vargas as an example. That was a legitimate example and one can come to their own conclusions regarding the statements that Mayweather made.

[V.WEBB]

Was that your attempt at being witty?

Seriously, all you've managed to do so far is to state the same things over and over. Be specific, ask a question and you get a specific response.

Being wity? No, it was a mere suggestion..because you've done a good job at switching the subject.