Comments Thread For: R. Mayweather Continues The Verbal Bashing of Pacquiao

[brick wall]

He didn't get a pass from me and still doesn't. Now what?

oh really? but you need battling nelson to confirm that you really criticized him heavily lol. aren't you suppose to hate dirrel?

[switchsouthpaw]

It was no more unsubstantiated than yours. And you brought him up. So I guess what you're saying is, you had no plausible reason for introducing him into the debate.

Roger brought it into the discussion (hence this thread). I rebutted his example by using another fighter in a similar situation. You labeled my example as wrong; however, instead of offering anything subjective in return, your response was simply to say "Vargas looked improved" to you. I turned around and said that happens with a lot of fighters, using Mosley as an example. Difference between you and I, is that I qualify my opinions with substantive information. You offer subjective circular arguments and when that fails? You let your ego get the best of you and come back with sarcasm and smiley faces. Jay said it best..."we don't believe you...you need more people". And don't use ether in the response, it's predictable.

[brick wall]

Just stop reaching man.

what? it's a fact that dirrel did not take wada testing because it's not required by the commission. and that happened after floyd came out with his ost advocacy. apparently, floyd has not influenced his co-black fighters.

[IMDAZED]

oh really? but you need battling nelson to confirm that you really criticized him heavily lol. aren't you suppose to hate dirrel?

Nope. I don't hate anyone I don't know personally.

[IMDAZED]

Roger brought it into the discussion (hence this thread). I rebutted his example using another fighter. You labeled my example as wrong; however, instead of offering anything subjective in return, your response was simply to say "Vargas looked improved" to you. I turned around and said that happens with a lot of fighters, using Mosley as an example. Difference between you and I, is that I qualify my opinions with substantive information. You offer subjective circular arguments and when that fails? You let your ego get the best of you and come back with sarcasm and smiley faces. Jay said it best..."we don't believe you...you need more people". And don't use ether in the response, it's predictable.

But you didn't rebut his example. So now what?

[switchsouthpaw]

But you didn't rebut his example. So now what?

Jesus....seriously dude are you the ******** that won?

[IMDAZED]

Jesus....seriously dude are you the ******** that won?

Back to me again.

[switchsouthpaw]

Back to me again.

Egoist.

By the way I didn't rebut his example, and yet you labeled it as wrong...yeh makes a ton of sense - sigh. Carry on short bus.

[IMDAZED]

Egoist.....

Still on me.

[brick wall]

Nope. I don't hate anyone I don't know personally.

oh i see...so you just find pac and peds an interesting topic eh? however if it's not pac, it becomes boring. blame pac's large fanbase.

or maybe it's because pac's rival is floyd...who gets a lot of love from you