PACQUIAO vs. Golden Boy and Mayweather LAWSUIT UPDATE

[hanzoh74]

How about when you're own conditioning coach is quoted publicly making a statement such as "I'm responsible for what he takes. He has no idea what he takes." and triggers speculation from those involved and observers?

How do you answer that one?

that quote means nothing just only haters and the *****s are speculating not the general public

[Aut_72]

Anyone who makes false allegations without proof deserve to be sued. I was wondering what was happening with this case. Not only did Pacquiao retire Gay la hoya in the ring, hes gonna retire his company. And Floyd Sr, Roger, and Floyd Jr can say all they want, I actually encourage them to keep talking because they are just providing more evidence towards Pacquiao's case. Lmao what a bunch of morons.

Pac gonna laugh all the way to the bank on this one.

Well you better start suing most of the posters on this site because almost everybody here thinks you are a complete moron...

[Pacquiao'd]

that quote means nothing just only haters and the *****s are speculating not the general public

*******s arent the general public. yall are simply *******s

[bartolomewj]

Pac's case has prima facie merit. Otherwise, the motion to dismiss would have been granted.

All cases are handled on a retainer basis. Then the client is charged "billable hours". In essence, the expenses that a plaintiff and defendant may incur would almost be the same if you consider the stage of the proceedings.

Awards for damages most of the time is on contingency basis meaning the law firm will collect a percentage if there is recovery and the legal costs in litigating normally is awarded to the winner.

So if Packy wins, GBP, Oscar, and the Mayweathers would have to ante the legal costs as well as pay the award for damages. And the judge not dismissing the case brings it closer to litigation which at this point seems to favor Pac.

[hanzoh74]

*******s arent the general public. yall are simply *******s

wow a comment from the dumbest ***** in NSB

[hanzoh74]

*******s arent the general public. yall are simply *******s

the problem with *****s they treat everone else a ******* when they dont believe Pac has been taking PEDs so whats the diffrence??

[PAKYO]

the problem with *****s they treat everone else a ******* when they dont believe Pac has been taking PEDs so whats the diffrence??

What do you expect from *****s? They're even more ****** than the ******est ******* and the one you quoted belonged to the bottomest rung of the *****s.

[PacquiaoATG]

Let's see, he suing every person for 75K in damages, he's gotta pay his lawyers for this cause I know it's not pro bono, let's say Pac is paying between 5-15K a month for all lawyers services. that's 70-150K wasted already on nonsense. Those prices are just being modest.

1 year has passed and they're just dismissing DLH and Schaffer's motion to dismiss. They haven't even got PBF's motion, that's gonna take a couple of months. Then they have the other matter with DLH, and they still won't get to the defamation hearing till mid 2012, then every person has to be handle individually. Good move PAC

That is nothing... Pacquiao is suing for Millions of dollars. Remember? I read the case. They posted in the public. The lawyers that submitted to Nevada. Its a win win for Pacquiao. Just FYI...

[Canelo Phresh]

in the end the bill of rights will prevail over this frivolous lawsuit that is wasting tax payers money. Freedom of speech is a right worth dying for especially when it is up against ***** hurt f@ggets.

[PacquiaoATG]

in the end the bill of rights will prevail over this frivolous lawsuit that is wasting tax payers money. Freedom of speech is a right worth dying for especially when it is up against ***** hurt f@ggets.

Freedom of speech has limitation. Just FYI. You can use Google search and find the Freedom of speech limitation and what is against the law..

http://www.google.com/search?hl=&q=Limitations+on+freedom+of+speech&sourceid=navclient-ff&rlz=1B3GGLL_enUS407US407&ie=UTF-8

Please do your research. Freedom for speech has limitation just FYI.