Originally posted by blackirish137
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who has the better legacy between Pacquiao and Duran?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by blackirish137 View PostI guess it means nothing that Duran was most notably smaller against ALL the HOF fighters he lost against? and also was past prime? and even then was facing the best Middleweight of all time, along with a guy that won titles at LHW and even beat a former Cruiserweight champ way past his prime?
how about the fact that Duran was the first man to go the distance with the greatest middleweight of all time during his title reign?
you sound like a moronic Klitschko fan, trying to argue with numbers. Pacquiao's wins over DLH and Morales mean very little, seeing as they were both WAY past prime. I mean ****, Camacho beat Leonard and Duran...Camacho>them. pwnt!
Comment
-
I havn't read the thread. Seems Blackirish has already shut it down though.
But, It's Duran. Obviously, It's Duran.
Comment
-
Originally posted by blackirish137 View PostI guess it means nothing that Duran was most notably smaller against ALL the HOF fighters he lost against? and also was past prime? and even then was facing the best Middleweight of all time, along with a guy that won titles at LHW and even beat a former Cruiserweight champ way past his prime?
how about the fact that Duran was the first man to go the distance with the greatest middleweight of all time during his title reign?
you sound like a moronic Klitschko fan, trying to argue with numbers. Pacquiao's wins over DLH and Morales mean very little, seeing as they were both WAY past prime. I mean ****, Camacho beat Leonard and Duran...Camacho>them. pwnt!
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by blackirish137 View PostI guess it means nothing that Duran was most notably smaller against ALL the HOF fighters he lost against? and also was past prime? and even then was facing the best Middleweight of all time, along with a guy that won titles at LHW and even beat a former Cruiserweight champ way past his prime?
how about the fact that Duran was the first man to go the distance with the greatest middleweight of all time during his title reign?
you sound like a moronic Klitschko fan, trying to argue with numbers. Pacquiao's wins over DLH and Morales mean very little, seeing as they were both WAY past prime. I mean ****, Camacho beat Leonard and Duran...Camacho>them. pwnt!
Now I would agree that DLH was WAY past prime. But let's not forget he was actually FAVORED to win against Pacquiao. Hindsight is nice, but leading up that fight the consensus belief was that Pacquiao's head was going to roll once DLH lands his left hand. And looking back, there's no reason to think otherwise. Pacquiao was moving up two full weight classes (12 pounds total), and fighting a guy whose been fighting at 154 for more than 5 years. So to say the size disparity was huge is an understatement. To me the huge size difference, coupled with the way Pacquiao disposed of him more than makes up for DLH being past prime.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Body Movin' View Postinstinto ducked and vanished from the thread... figured that's what trolls would do anyway.
Originally posted by KILLA RIGHT View Postjro how old are u bro? If u dont mind me asking? You and silencers are the only 2 posters i really GET AMAZED WHEN IT COMES TO BOX LEDGE
Comment
-
Originally posted by studentofthegam View PostWell do you have those numbers to school me because Im looking right now and the losses to HoFers is pretty evident.
2 to Leonard
2 to Pazienza2 to Camacho
1 each to Hagler and Hearns
Which 9 matches against Hall of Famers did he win?
Why is it in all of these threads your talking utter ****?
Are you a troll? Or are you just plain uneducated?
Comment
-
Comment