Originally posted by cklmaced
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Would the klitchko's last in the 70s?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by cklmaced View PostActually its the Klit fans who are using ****** arguements to try say he's better than Ali. Just think about how ****** that sounds, I honestly can't see how anybody can think that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spray_resistant View PostHe very well could have a better chin than Tyson, I have doubts that Holy could ko Wlad.
As for Vaulev/Tyson/power thing......it really shows how far you guys are reaching going to some extreme example to make the K-bros look bad.
I can easily do that watch, FWs hit harder than WWs because Ponce de leon probably hits harder than Paulie Malinaggi.
and Pnce De Leon hitting harder than Malignaggi...why wouldnt that be legitimate(if its true)? just goes to show that size is not the only thing that matters when it comes to punching power.
the funny thing is that I actually think Wladimir has a very good chance against Ali. stylistically he would give Ali absolute hell. but putting down an entire excellent era? come on now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spray_resistant View PostNo one is saying he is better but Ali wasn't a perfect fighter and its not out of the realm of possibility that Wlad could beat him. Wlad is after all one of the hardest punchers ever in the history of the sport not to mention usually doing well against slick elusive fighters.
Comment
-
Originally posted by blackirish137 View Postextreme examples are the only way to get to some people.
and Pnce De Leon hitting harder than Malignaggi...why wouldnt that be legitimate(if its true)? just goes to show that size is not the only thing that matters when it comes to punching power.
the funny thing is that I actually think Wladimir has a very good chance against Ali. stylistically he would give Ali absolute hell. but putting down an entire excellent era? come on now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by cklmaced View PostI can't tell if your being sarcastic or not. Hweightblogger has being saying Wlad is better the whole thread. I must have missed all those slick fighters he faced LOL.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hweightblogger1) You know that The Clay won Olympics as a LIGHT-HEAVYWEIGHT, don't you?
2) This pic is from 1963 http://www.corbisimages.com/********...x?id=U1362715A
You also know Holyfield became HW champion multiple times, and deserved a decision over 310lb Valuev at 45 years old and Valuev is a top fighter in todays divison right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spray_resistant View PostI did that? I am just raising questions about what the old timers could really do and how because of their size the K-bros would have advantages and make some fighters who looked really great and had great ko%s against smaller guys appear as if they would belong in a different weight class as them(because they would)
the Klitschko brothers are excellent fighters, and you can make solid arguments for them winning certain fights against other greats. but the way they put down outstanding HW fighters is just wrong.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spray_resistant View PostByrd and Chambers are slick smaller fighters, they are the best examples we have of how he does against an opponent like that and historically being at a speed disadvantage has not caused Wlad a problem.
Comment
Comment