Judah Says Pacquiao's Fights Are Possibly Staged

[SERVILEV]

Sorry to say, but this is one of the most ******ed articles I've read.

i second that, it really is.. guess oscar was part of that scandal aswell. and hatton. i like judah but cmon man, He wont get a fight with Pac that way, if he makes it that far.

[SERVILEV]

only thing staged about Pacman is his Hair-do lmbo

[RoyalFlush]

just one word comes to mind, "unprecedented". people start to imagine things because of that, all the absurd accusations. must be a one hell of a compliment if things made judah say such, i remember before he was also one of those who accused pac of ped use. and now this, lol

[The Hammer]

Judah is envious of Pacquiao's success.

[hugh grant]

If it can eventually be proved that the clottey fight wasnt fixed, that Pac opponents dont throw the fight, that he isnt on roids, will you all just admit hes the best ever fighter.?

[ummeed]

U are the second guy on this tread owning himself bro.Sure it's no coincidence that come forward fights are fan friendly.Basically U just admitted that that's all he's been fighting.And that they picked Clottey because the Floyd fight fell through.But Clottey was top rank & won't beat Pacman's high output thanks again though.

yes i know that pac has mostly been fighting come forward fighters lately, but that's also because those guys not only bring the most money, but that they are also relevant because of their names, and the achievements/resume they carry with them... that and they are actually fcking great fighters until hindsight decides to kick in!

yes, clottey was top rank so what? you're talking as if clottey had no chance at beating pac. the dude was built like a tank, and he was just waiting for some openings and/or pac's stamina to betray him. it wasn't that clottey had no chance, pac just made sure he had no chance (until later rounds) by playing the perfect game.
....clottey also being known to fold during his biggest/closest fights didn't help the case either.

owning myself? lmao think again, bro. unlike you, who's too narrow minded to actually see the bigger picture, i try to view both sides. when, i debate, i try to actually be emphatic of the point the other side is trying to make. i know this is a bit new to you, but this is how educated debate goes. you don't just stick to your point and ramble while ignoring the counter point, that's called an immature argument. if that is what you are actually searching for... i'm sorry but you're better off talking with the other posters, i'm pretty sure alot of them would be delighted to join you.

[Jedi Vader]

owning myself? lmao think again, bro. unlike you, who's too narrow minded to actually see the bigger picture, i try to view both sides. when, i debate, i try to actually be emphatic of the point the other side is trying to make. i know this is a bit new to you, but this is how educated debate goes. you don't just stick to your point and ramble while ignoring the counter point, that's called an immature argument. if that is what you are actually searching for... i'm sorry but you're better off talking with the other posters, i'm pretty sure alot of them would be delighted to join you.

It's called Bigotry.

[Mach3]

wow, bob must have had one hell of a casting call getting all these guys then. some probably even deserve an oscar...

Yeah the reason why we are not seeing an Floyd-Pacman fight. Apparantly Floyd does not agree on the script.

[ummeed]

It's called Bigotry.

that term might just be too big for him to swallow.
insert **** related jokes here.

[ummeed]

Yeah the reason why we are not seeing an Floyd-Pacman fight. Apparantly Floyd does not agree on the script.

well fck! floyd can stick to his guns if he so wishes it... the guy has a solid resume of sports entertainment from wwe after all.