why do the klits make contracts where you have to fight the other if 1 loses?

[jimmy1569]

I honestly think Vitali ducked Rahman. Rahman did 3 things in boxing that Vitali did not

1. Floored a prime Lennox Lewis
2. Floored a Prime Corrie Sanders
3. Floored David Tua(Klitschkos ducked Tua completely)

I think Vitali wouldve won personally but I can understand his fear and concern.
__________________
LMAO.....ask Sanders who did more brain damage to him... I guarantee you If Lewis was smiling with his hands down giving Vitali THE SAME opening..same exact result would've taken place (sans rematch) as we already know Lennox doesn't give heavyweights with the highest knockout percentage of alltimes..rematches. Lennox HAD his hands held high to save that glass chin after he tasted Vk's POWER in rd 2... Funny how HASIM IS 0-1-1 gainst Tua got ktfo & drew with him.. Vitali scores a 12-0 rd beatdown against Tua & WOULD EVEN BE The first to knock him out as i don't think he'd take the punishment from KLITSCHKO AS HE DID from Lewis. Nice try though.....46-0.

[yessuh]

Klitschkos ducked Tua completely

Stop making up lies you idiot.

[Larry the boss]

Stop making up lies you idiot.

look at this b1tch..tunneys dumbass alt

[Marchegiano]

***** insurence! the Klitschkos, though less *****es than Haye, have plenty of ***** in them. They require ***** ass contracts

[hweightblogger]

im a fan of the klits but that has to be the worse contract ive ever seen..and thats just the tip of the iceburg..you gotta rematch one and if you beat one twice you have to fight the other??wtf??

JUST IMAGINE someone beating Vitali Klitschko.

And then imagine this Klitschko-conqueror fighting the other Klitschko.

This would be
1) the most mouth-watering and
2) the most fan-friendly action ever heard of

Don King had 5+ option contracts, but you start the thread and try to pervert such 2 or 3 options contracts into something negative.

Instead of describing it as "He has to fight the other Klitschko" it's in reality "He has a guaranteed shot at the other brother", which would be one of the most fan-friendly and one of the most lucrative fights EVER in the history of boxing.

[Joeyzagz]

JUST IMAGINE someone beating Vitali Klitschko.

And then imagine this Klitschko-conqueror fighting the other Klitschko.

This would be
1) the most mouth-watering and
2) the most fan-friendly action ever heard of

Don King had 5+ option contracts, but you start the thread and try to pervert such 2 or 3 options contracts into something negative.

Instead of describing it as "He has to fight the other Klitschko" it's in reality "He has a guaranteed shot at the other brother", which would be one of the most fan-friendly and one of the most lucrative fights EVER in the history of boxing.

Dont sugarcoat it, man. There game is to set up 2 on 1 handicapped matches. This stuff wouldnt be legal in any other sport besides Wrestling!

The endurance mode from Mortal Kombat is a lot like Klitschko's strategy:

You have to fight two guys back to back before advancing. They both can take blood off of you, but they are not taking blood off of each other.

The tag-team strategy is very effective and you dont necessarily need elite fighters to make it work. Ken Norton and Jimmy Young couldve knocked off the best Heavies of the 70's, if they picked and chose according to their advantages & formed an alliance. Oh yeah and Slave Contracts!!!

[blaze778]

Has this ever been done in the history of the sport??i heard of a rematch clause but how do you obligate them to fight a totally differant person???and i like the klits but thats unheard of..............

I don't think I've ever heard of that.

And why not just an immediate rematch clause instead of having to fight the brother. I don't see any harm in fighting both brothers as I'm sure most HWs would love the shot at beating both of them, but it just seems odd to make that a requirement to fight one of them.