Has this ever been done in the history of the sport??i heard of a rematch clause but how do you obligate them to fight a totally differant person???and i like the klits but thats unheard of..............
why do the klits make contracts where you have to fight the other if 1 loses?
Collapse
-
and why do they tell you what hotel to stay at?? thats odd..why would they care where you stay??
i just dont get it -
Idk.. but Id look at it as an opportunity for 3 big paydays.
I guess they wanna have a contract in place in case they lose their belts.
and they wanna keep it in the fam.
Other than being unheard of I don't really see it as "wrong" as I think the champs should be dictating the terms on the contracts.Comment
-
but how do you sign a contract to fight 1 person and they include a totally differant person whos holding a totally differant sanctioning bodies title???Idk.. but Id look at it as an opportunity for 3 big paydays.
I guess they wanna have a contract in place in case they lose their belts.
and they wanna keep it in the fam.
Other than being unheard of I don't really see it as "wrong" as I think the champs should be dictating the terms on the contracts.Comment
-
im a fan of the klits but that has to be the worse contract ive ever seen..and thats just the tip of the iceburg..you gotta rematch one and if you beat one twice you have to fight the other??wtf??Comment
-
Comment
-
That is strange, but really if someone does beat one of them that fighter should want to fight the other. They are the 2 most important HW in the sport so if you beat one, might as well go after the other.Comment
Comment