Dan Rafael BLASTS the WBC!!!!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • extracurRICular
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jul 2008
    • 13023
    • 1,499
    • 650
    • 105,740

    #1

    Dan Rafael BLASTS the WBC!!!!

    I wish more writers, columnist and reporters would expose the alphabet b!tches for what they are..........atta boy DRafa!!!!

    Middleweight contender Avtandil Khurtsidze has had a long wait for another shot at a belt, but it's here now and Khurtsidze vows to make it count.


    Need a laugh? Read WBC's new rankings
    February, 9, 2011
    Feb 9
    11:44
    AM ET

    * Email
    * Print
    * Comments20

    I don't know why I do it, but month after month I subject myself to reading the new batch of divisional rankings put out by the WBC.

    As I have written many times before, the rankings have very little to do with reality in boxing, only the fantasy world of El Presidente for life Jose Sulaiman and his puppet board of governors.

    Last fall, I wrote a blog outlining only the most glaring lunacy in the rankings. Months have passed, so it's time to shine a light on the newest absurdity in the rankings, which infected my inbox Tuesday.

    About the only good thing I have to say about them is that, thankfully, Evander Holyfield is not ranked in the heavyweight division. Beyond that? It's bad. Let's take a look at the most rancid aspects:

    • At heavyweight, Cristobal Arreola is ranked No. 3, one spot ahead of Tomasz Adamek. The problem? Adamek beat Arreola head-to-head without controversy less than a year ago, and they've both won two fights against similar caliber competition since then. Apparently, beating a guy has no actual bearing on where you rank in relation to the man you've beaten.

    • Also at heavyweight, Ray Austin has lingered near the top of the rankings seemingly forever without ever actually beating a legitimate top opponent (and after getting knocked out in two rounds in a blowout by Wladimir Klitschko, who was defending another organization's belt). Austin had been fraudulently ranked No. 1 before a clear loss to Odlanier Solis in a December title eliminator. I figured at last we'd be done with him threatening the top spot. Alas, he still ranks fifth. Maybe he has pictures of someone at the WBC? Realistically, he probably doesn't belong in the top 20.

    • Super middleweight is a toxic disaster. Kelly Pavlik, the former middleweight champion who hasn't fought since losing his title last April (and recently spending two months as an in-patient at an alcohol rehabilitation facility) is suddenly the No. 1 contender at 168 pounds. So he is coming off a loss and has yet to fight as a bona fide super middleweight, but he is the No. 1 contender? Sure, whatever El Presidente says.

    • If Pavlik's No. 1 status doesn't make you sick enough, just look over the rest of the 168-pound rankings. One of the more incredible rankings is Arthur Abraham at No. 3. That is mind-blowing. Abraham, who was a fine middleweight titlist in another organization, moved up to super middleweight and knocked out another blown-up middleweight, former champ Jermain Taylor, in October 2009 in the Super Six tournament. Since then, Abraham has suffered two one-sided losses in the tournament, to Andre Dirrell and Carl Froch. Yet, miraculously, he ranks ahead of Glen Johnson, who is fifth and coming off a big knockout of Allan Green in the Super Six?

    • At middleweight, Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. is the No. 1 contender. Simply put, it's one of the most laughable rankings in boxing history. Just peruse Chavez's padded and protected record for 10 seconds and you get the idea. Meanwhile, Sergio Martinez, the real middleweight champ, was stripped by the odious WBC and named "champion emeritus," which makes no sense whatsoever because he is active and will fight March 12.

    • At junior welterweight, a child plucking names out of a hat could probably come up with a better set of ratings than the outlandish WBC has. For starters, Erik Morales, the long-faded three-division champion (122 pounds, 126 and 130) is somehow, some way the No. 1 contender. This is more horrible than just about anything else in the entire set of rankings (even worse than Chavez's ranking, in fact). It's not credible in any way, shape or form. Of course, Morales' long-standing relationship with El Presidente, and the fact that the Mexico City-based WBC has always favored Mexican fighters, can't be overlooked. For perspective, keep in mind that Morales, who has won three lesser fights since ending a 2½-year retirement (and only one in the 140-pound division), ranks ahead of recently deposed titleholder Devon Alexander (No. 2), Victor Ortiz (No. 8) and Lamont Peterson (No. 21, who fought to a draw with Ortiz in December).

    • You want more lunacy? At bantamweight, Vic Darchinyan has a 1-2 record. He is coming off a loss to Abner Mares and also lost to Joseph Agbeko for another organization's belt in July 2009. His lone win at 118 pounds was against journeyman Eric Barcelona (he of 17 losses). For that undistinguished record, the WBC ranks Darchinyan third. Ranked fourth? Nonito Donaire, who owns a pulverizing knockout of Darchinyan (granted, at flyweight) and is coming off a sensational knockout of well-respected former titleholder Wladimir Sidorenko. It simply makes no sense.

    • At junior middleweight, Antonio Margarito, who had his face broken in a shutout loss to Manny Pacquiao in a November title fight he never remotely deserved in the first place, ranks fifth. This is despite the fact he was tortured by Pacquiao and still has never scored a win of note in the division. Pacquiao has notified the WBC that he has no plans to defend his 154-pound trinket, so the WBC had no real choice but to vacate the belt on Tuesday. All I can say is that it warms my heart to know that El Presidente and his puppet board of governors won't be involved in Pacquiao's May 7 fight with Shane Mosley and, therefore, will not receive a sanctioning fee.

    Month after month, the WBC's rankings are a joke, which is sad because they significantly impact the fights we see. I guess I'd feel a little better if maybe the WBC would just send silver belts, interim titles and emeritus trinkets to Fight Freaks everywhere -- for a small sanctioning fee, of course.
  • Kevin Malone
    @********Lampley
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2009
    • 4936
    • 243
    • 260
    • 11,457

    #2
    It seems he does this column every month. It's funny if you've never read it, but it gets old...

    Comment

    • JmH Reborn
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 4874
      • 238
      • 127
      • 12,377

      #3
      Originally posted by Kevin Malone
      It seems he does this column every month. It's funny if you've never read it, but it gets old...
      I'm glad someone is trying to hold these crooks accountable

      Comment

      • Dave Rado
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Dec 2008
        • 8064
        • 266
        • 453
        • 14,460

        #4
        What I don't understand is why a lot of boxers, promoters, and boxing boards (including the BBBC) regard the WBC title as the most prestigious of the alphabet belts.

        Of course, saying that one of the alphabet organisations is more prestigious then the others is a bit like saying that Stalin was more saintly than Hitler and Genghis Khan. But if you've got to pick one, why pick the most corrupt one of the lot?

        Comment

        • Pullcounter
          no guts no glory
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2004
          • 42582
          • 549
          • 191
          • 49,739

          #5
          i'm guessing the WBC isn't recognizing any fights not sanctioned by the WBC... that's the only way they can have such horrible rankings.

          Comment

          • gauze
            white lives matter
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Oct 2008
            • 4117
            • 613
            • 322
            • 10,187

            #6
            Originally posted by Dave Rado
            What I don't understand is why a lot of boxers, promoters, and boxing boards (including the BBBC) regard the WBC title as the most prestigious of the alphabet belts.

            Of course, saying that one of the alphabet organisations is more prestigious then the others is a bit like saying that Stalin was more saintly than Hitler and Genghis Khan. But if you've got to pick one, why pick the most corrupt one of the lot?
            its because the belt is green

            Comment

            • Dave Rado
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2008
              • 8064
              • 266
              • 453
              • 14,460

              #7
              Originally posted by gauze
              its because the belt is green
              Was that a joke?

              Comment

              • dvb
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2010
                • 1479
                • 75
                • 106
                • 7,684

                #8
                rankings and ratings are so bad.

                and who the **** needs a "super" champion,or real champion,and then a fake paper champion as a "regular" champion,in the same title organisation!.

                things like that ruin the populairty,as no one knows whos the real champ and dont know who to follow.

                they just follow whos big like pac floyd or bhop,the legends dont need titles,the title legend is better than any title that they get charged for holding.

                Comment

                • gauze
                  white lives matter
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Oct 2008
                  • 4117
                  • 613
                  • 322
                  • 10,187

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Dave Rado
                  Was that a joke?
                  im really not sure. i suppose its the fanciest looking of the belts and fighters are usually into "bling" once they've acquired their new-found wealth after winning big fights.

                  Comment

                  • Tiozzo
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2007
                    • 6234
                    • 278
                    • 330
                    • 6,886

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Dave Rado
                    What I don't understand is why a lot of boxers, promoters, and boxing boards (including the BBBC) regard the WBC title as the most prestigious of the alphabet belts.

                    Of course, saying that one of the alphabet organisations is more prestigious then the others is a bit like saying that Stalin was more saintly than Hitler and Genghis Khan. But if you've got to pick one, why pick the most corrupt one of the lot?
                    because of its history of course

                    but I agree that the WBC should not be regarded as highly still

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP