Quartey or Clottey??????

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jrosales13
    undisputed champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 32632
    • 739
    • 763
    • 40,023

    #21
    This is not even debatable. It is Quartey.

    Comment

    • Eaner0919
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Nov 2004
      • 8625
      • 370
      • 80
      • 15,578

      #22
      forgotten aspect is that Quartey had warrior instincts to go along with all that talent

      Clotty not so much

      Comment

      • figzuki
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2010
        • 2187
        • 73
        • 83
        • 8,413

        #23
        Originally posted by Eaner0919
        forgotten aspect is that Quartey had warrior instincts to go along with all that talent

        Clotty not so much
        yup agree 100%

        Comment

        • -Kev-
          this is boxing
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2006
          • 39960
          • 5,045
          • 1,449
          • 234,543

          #24
          They lost when it mattered most. But they were also "victims" of bad judging. People argue that Quartey beat DLH, and he probably should have won against Forresst. But he was beaten by Vargas and Winky.

          Clottey on the other hand, I think the only bad judging was Cotto-Clottey. I think Clottey should have a win over Cotto. But he also lost when it mattered most[Margarito and Pacquiao].

          Definitely, Quartey had the better career and was the better fighter.

          Comment

          • figzuki
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2010
            • 2187
            • 73
            • 83
            • 8,413

            #25
            Originally posted by -Kev-
            They lost when it mattered most. But they were also "victims" of bad judging. People argue that Quartey beat DLH, and he probably should have won against Forresst. But he was beaten by Vargas and Winky.

            Clottey on the other hand, I think the only bad judging was Cotto-Clottey. I think Clottey should have a win over Cotto. But he also lost when it mattered most[Margarito and Pacquiao].

            Definitely, Quartey had the better career and was the better fighter.
            I was paying attention up until here...

            Comment

            • Chief2ndzOnly!
              Long Live Walt Liquor!!!!
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 12629
              • 1,561
              • 1,396
              • 222,500

              #26
              Originally posted by figzuki
              Who do ya'll think is the better boxer?


              IMO I think Quartey was a much better boxer than Clottey!










              Decided to make this thread to get away from all the sellouts who only want to pay attention to Pac, Mayweather, Khan all day everyday...

              Discussion about them is fine but not 10 out of the 15 threads on the opening page lol....

              Quartey by a long country mile.......... It aint even close.

              Comment

              • yuppie
                Up and Coming Prospect
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2010
                • 1814
                • 107
                • 11
                • 8,409

                #27
                Originally posted by figzuki
                DID IT!!! troll...

                GTFOH!!!
                I reckon Muhammad Ali would of beaten Quartey

                Comment

                • Chief2ndzOnly!
                  Long Live Walt Liquor!!!!
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 12629
                  • 1,561
                  • 1,396
                  • 222,500

                  #28
                  Originally posted by -Kev-
                  They lost when it mattered most. But they were also "victims" of bad judging. People argue that Quartey beat DLH, and he probably should have won against Forresst. But he was beaten by Vargas and Winky.

                  Clottey on the other hand, I think the only bad judging was Cotto-Clottey. I think Clottey should have a win over Cotto. But he also lost when it mattered most[Margarito and Pacquiao].

                  Definitely, Quartey had the better career and was the better fighter.
                  Originally posted by figzuki
                  I was paying attention up until here...
                  Actually. I completely agree. Clottey should have a win over Cotto. The fight was close because Joshua has been having a hard time pulling the trigger these past few years.

                  Comment

                  • MACAQUEINBLACK
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 7720
                    • 485
                    • 1,170
                    • 10,473

                    #29
                    Not even a question.


                    Bazooka is better in every regard.

                    Comment

                    • figzuki
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 2187
                      • 73
                      • 83
                      • 8,413

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Chief2ndzOnly!
                      Actually. I completely agree. Clottey should have a win over Cotto. The fight was close because Joshua has been having a hard time pulling the trigger these past few years.
                      umm no it was close cuz Cotto had a gash the size of a war trench over his eye from a clottey headbutt.....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP