Comments Thread For: Bradley: I Knew in The First, Alexander Isn't on My Level
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Why do people continually say Bradley dominated???? He won but dominated is the overstatement of the year. Bradley threw extremely amateurish shots, especially between round 1-3 and wasn't as brilliant some claim that he was. "Not on my level" get outta here. I like Bradley but the more he opens his mouth I'm regretful to say that. Shut your mouth as if your the greatest we've ever had the priviledge of watching. Just fight, and let the W's do the talkingComment
-
Why do people continually say Bradley dominated???? He won but dominated is the overstatement of the year. Bradley threw extremely amateurish shots, especially between round 1-3 and wasn't as brilliant some claim that he was. "Not on my level" get outta here. I like Bradley but the more he opens his mouth I'm regretful to say that. Shut your mouth as if your the greatest we've ever had the priviledge of watching. Just fight, and let the W's do the talkingComment
-
Rome, he definitely won the fight, he did more, I just don't associate the way he won with dominating. Everyone's eyes are different but I didn't see it. He dominated Nate Cambell, for those 3 rounds, but this fight not so much. By the standards your putting, yes, but do I feel Bradley did it, no. This might just have to be agree to disagree. What was more disappointing was the fight Alexander came with, he fought horrible. Bradley could have done more as well. If we would have used a solid professional jab more, he definitely could have dominated. But, at the end of the day, he won, and thats what counts. Cunningham and Alexander need to zip it too, I appreciate passion, but when it supercedes professionalism, Im not with that. To each their own!Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
Comment