Who has the better Resume?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IMDAZED
    Fair but Firm
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2006
    • 42644
    • 1,134
    • 1,770
    • 67,152

    #31
    Originally posted by blackirish137
    hmm...debatable. Hopkins was pretty unproven. and although like you said a lot of them were out the door or changing divisions, guys like Toney, McCallum, Jackson, Kalambay, McClellan, and Johnson deserved to be above Hopkins at that present time.

    regardless, the Hopkins win was very good, but he flat out was not prime.
    Neither was Jones.

    Comment

    • Barn
      TheTartanSoldier
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2010
      • 8647
      • 675
      • 624
      • 42,074

      #32
      Originally posted by IMDAZED
      What he said.
      What he said he said.

      Comment

      • Bastian Loc
        schweinsteiger innit?
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Sep 2010
        • 10027
        • 334
        • 180
        • 17,886

        #33
        Originally posted by jrosales13
        So why are you assuming that I'm talking about the first fight?
        Cuz' I tend to think in chronological order.

        Fraud won the second fight, and there should've been a rubbermatch imo.

        Comment

        • Steak
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Aug 2006
          • 10713
          • 509
          • 268
          • 17,902

          #34
          Originally posted by IMDAZED
          Neither was Jones.
          being not prime yourself doesnt make the other guy prime magically.

          Comment

          • IMDAZED
            Fair but Firm
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2006
            • 42644
            • 1,134
            • 1,770
            • 67,152

            #35
            Originally posted by blackirish137
            being not prime yourself doesnt make the other guy prime magically.
            I never said he was.

            Comment

            • D4thincarnation
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2011
              • 16198
              • 533
              • 260
              • 133,240

              #36
              Originally posted by blackirish137
              maybe by an alphabet belt, which means little since their records are terrible and also they flat out ignore the existance of the belts' champions. In reality, he was around 9th in the division.

              good win, but Hopkins was not prime, and Roy being slightly not prime doesnt change that.
              It was the IBF ranking. Roy was probably less experience that Hopkins.

              Hopkins also decided to stay away from Roy during his prime years. Roy offered him 60/40 but Hopkins would not accept.

              Hopkins just feasted on blown up light-middles and welters when RJJ was moving up through the weights to heavy beating some great fighters along the way and putting on some great shows.

              Comment

              • Dirk Diggler UK
                Deleted
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 48836
                • 1,312
                • 693
                • 58,902

                #37
                Originally posted by IMDAZED
                Neither was Jones.
                He had more of a pedigree.

                Comment

                • IMDAZED
                  Fair but Firm
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 42644
                  • 1,134
                  • 1,770
                  • 67,152

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                  He had more of a pedigree.
                  Yes he did.

                  Comment

                  • Dirk Diggler UK
                    Deleted
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 48836
                    • 1,312
                    • 693
                    • 58,902

                    #39
                    I actually might favour Mayweather on this one.

                    Comment

                    • Steak
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 10713
                      • 509
                      • 268
                      • 17,902

                      #40
                      Originally posted by IMDAZED
                      I never said he was.
                      then we agree Hopkins was not prime when Roy beat him, although Roy had about a year to go before turning prime himself. excellent.
                      It was the IBF ranking. Roy was probably less experience that Hopkins.

                      Hopkins also decided to stay away from Roy during his prime years. Roy offered him 60/40 but Hopkins would not accept.

                      Hopkins just feasted on blown up light-middles and welters when RJJ was moving up through the weights to heavy beating some great fighters along the way and putting on some great shows.
                      irrelevant. fact is Roy never beat a prime Hopkins, so Im not going to give him credit for a win over a prime Hopkins, even though it was a solid win. its as simple as that.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP