Which win is more impressive, Mayweather vs Corrales or Pacquiao vs Barrera 1?

[V.WEBB]

Pac>Barrera better victory by far
Barrera lineal champion having strong run at the top
Corrales was unbeaten but far inferior to Barrera, also going to jail
love Chico but he is overrated by many

I love when you guys throw that in there.

[miron_lang]

Historically Barrera > than Corrales. Having said that Floyd put on a dominant performance. Corrales actually hit him with a few bombs which Floyd shrugged off easily.

At 130 Corrales would prob best Barrera too.

So it's difficult to say isn't it??

Pac also manhandled the 29 yr. old Barrera like a rag doll. Its not difficult at all.


Its like

Montiel or Donairre dominating the other one as to

a belt holder from 122 like Toshiaki Nishioka totally destroying Juan Manuel Lopez

[M.I.C.]

I bet Chico would of kicked Barrera's azz with no problem, Floyd's win at 130, way more impressive

[-Hyperion-]

barrera is just the better fighter...he is the better win....and was coming off his best stretch resume wise(though, we all know morales shouldve gotten the W in their 2nd fight...just before Pacquiao) that got him to p4p #2

that said, mayweather looked great vs Corrales....

[Walt Liquor]

I bet Chico would of kicked Barrera's azz with no problem, Floyd's win at 130, way more impressive

cuz chico performed so well against great boxers. so there's precedence

[TOBYLEE1]

Corrales and Barrera on the way to their respective fights both fighters had notable wins and after their loses also gained notable wins. Barrera had Hamed in his resume but it is real difficult to pick one(he also lost twice to Jr Jones).

[jrosales13]

, @ the arguments that are used for Corrales favor...Undefeated and he would beat Barrera smh....Like if that has anything to do with it.

[TOBYLEE1]

, @ the arguments that are used for Corrales favor...Undefeated and he would beat Barrera smh....Like if that has anything to do with it.

Like it would be a sure thing, you never know what is going to happen till both fighters are in the ring

[joelab75]

Barrera was a P4P top 5 when pac beat him. already a future hall of famer and ATG.

Corales was? None..hadnt accomplished even half of what Barrera accomplished before or after Pac fight.

so WTF! Barrera was great. Corales wasnt. Barrera is ATG. Corales isnt. Barrera is a future hall of famer. Corales? not even close..what is there to argue? *****S and HATERS still trying to come up with excuses huh? trying to make it look like Corales was better than Barrera!

[jrosales13]

Barrera was a P4P top 5 when pac beat him. already a future hall of famer and ATG.

Corales was? None..hadnt accomplished even half of what Barrera accomplished before or after Pac fight.

so WTF! Barrera was great. Corales wasnt. Barrera is ATG. Corales isnt. Barrera is a future hall of famer. Corales? not even close..what is there to argue? *****S and HATERS still trying to come up with excuses huh? trying to make it look like Corales was better than Barrera!

You're actually coming off as a hater right there. To say Chico is not even close to being a HOF'er is really ridiculous and just being a hater or is just pure fanboyism exaggeration.