simple question to all floyd fans
Collapse
-
No one is a resident doctor. I have a keyboard like you do. The problem is 95% of you look for stuff to suit your agenda/bias instead of just poring through everything and reaching your own conclusion. If you did that, we'd all hit the same bullseye.Comment
-
-
Are you trying to implicate that my god is a suspected steroid abuser?Comment
-
If you read the whole statement
"urine test alone can be used to detect the presence of recombinant EPO" is not the same with "only urine test can be used to detect the presence of recombinant EPO and blood test don't"
I think the second one is your interpretation that why you ask.. "why does WADA still blood test"
I post that from WADA site because my interpretation is that if we have two test. Namely urine test and blood test. If urine test alone can be used to detect PED then there is no need for the blood test.
Its like urine test detect x w and z and blood test detect x w and z also. If that is the result always there is no need for the blood test since the urine test is accurate.
I would like to add from the WADA site
This report also recommended that urine testing be used in conjunction with blood screening for a variety of reasons, including the cost savings of performing blood screening prior to testing urine. Some international sports federations still use both urine and blood matrix for the detection of EPO. Recently, the urine test was adapted to blood to perform detection of some new erythropoiesis stimulating agents.Comment
-
It's all good daze. I only brought up hair analysis to see if anyone knew if it was a valid consideration or not.
I won't be arguing with anyone about testing procedures. Unless either side can prove that they've actually studied it extensively in school or interviewed someone that we can all deem qualified, then it just becomes a contest of my google results are better than yours.
But for the record, I'll try remember
Hair analysis - daze says no.Comment
-
They blood test because EPO (and other forms) disappear in a matter of hours but the effects don't. So if they don't get it on the urine, they'll notice the changes over time on the blood.If you read the whole statement
"urine test alone can be used to detect the presence of recombinant EPO" is not the same with "only urine test can be used to detect the presence of recombinant EPO and blood test don't"
I think the second one is your interpretation that why you ask.. "why does WADA still blood test"
I post that from WADA site because my interpretation is that if we have two test. Namely urine test and blood test. If urine test alone can be used to detect PED then there is no need for the blood test.
Its like urine test detect x w and z and blood test detect x w and z also. If that is the result always there is no need for the blood test since the urine test is accurate.
I would like to add from the WADA site
This report also recommended that urine testing be used in conjunction with blood screening for a variety of reasons, including the cost savings of performing blood screening prior to testing urine. Some international sports federations still use both urine and blood matrix for the detection of EPO. Recently, the urine test was adapted to blood to perform detection of some new erythropoiesis stimulating agents.Comment
-
Comment