simple question to all floyd fans

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IMDAZED
    Fair but Firm
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2006
    • 42644
    • 1,134
    • 1,770
    • 67,152

    #81
    Originally posted by MtClimber
    I want real answers to my questions
    www.wada.org

    Comment

    • » HE3R0 «
      EVA Unit 02
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Dec 2009
      • 747
      • 200
      • 293
      • 7,027

      #82
      Originally posted by jrosales13
      There you go, there's your answer.
      I guess daze is the resident doctor. I'll try to remember that next time.

      Comment

      • Eaner0919
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Nov 2004
        • 8625
        • 370
        • 80
        • 15,578

        #83
        Originally posted by AeKhuban
        Do you know specific PED that after a fight will be out on boxer's system immediately?
        http://www.maxboxing.com/news/promo-...onte-weighs-in

        Comment

        • IMDAZED
          Fair but Firm
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 42644
          • 1,134
          • 1,770
          • 67,152

          #84
          Originally posted by he3r0
          I guess daze is the resident doctor. I'll try to remember that next time.
          No one is a resident doctor. I have a keyboard like you do. The problem is 95% of you look for stuff to suit your agenda/bias instead of just poring through everything and reaching your own conclusion. If you did that, we'd all hit the same bullseye.

          Comment

          • MtClimber
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 174
            • 4
            • 0
            • 7,306

            #85
            Originally posted by IMDAZED
            It didn't
            ...

            Comment

            • Carpe Diem
              Seize the day
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2010
              • 16022
              • 1,232
              • 996
              • 44,413

              #86
              Originally posted by IMDAZED
              No one is a resident doctor. I have a keyboard like you do. The problem is 95% of you look for stuff to suit your agenda/bias instead of just poring through everything and reaching your own conclusion. If you did that, we'd all hit the same bullseye.
              Are you trying to implicate that my god is a suspected steroid abuser?

              Comment

              • AeKhuban
                Contender
                • Jan 2011
                • 157
                • 4
                • 1
                • 6,231

                #87
                Originally posted by IMDAZED
                Why are you still here? We told you you don't know what you're talking about. Now please stop. Ask yourself, why does WADA still blood test then? Come back when you get the answer. ONLY THEN.
                If you read the whole statement

                "urine test alone can be used to detect the presence of recombinant EPO" is not the same with "only urine test can be used to detect the presence of recombinant EPO and blood test don't"

                I think the second one is your interpretation that why you ask.. "why does WADA still blood test"

                I post that from WADA site because my interpretation is that if we have two test. Namely urine test and blood test. If urine test alone can be used to detect PED then there is no need for the blood test.
                Its like urine test detect x w and z and blood test detect x w and z also. If that is the result always there is no need for the blood test since the urine test is accurate.

                I would like to add from the WADA site

                This report also recommended that urine testing be used in conjunction with blood screening for a variety of reasons, including the cost savings of performing blood screening prior to testing urine. Some international sports federations still use both urine and blood matrix for the detection of EPO. Recently, the urine test was adapted to blood to perform detection of some new erythropoiesis stimulating agents.

                Comment

                • » HE3R0 «
                  EVA Unit 02
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 747
                  • 200
                  • 293
                  • 7,027

                  #88
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED
                  No one is a resident doctor. I have a keyboard like you do. The problem is 95% of you look for stuff to suit your agenda/bias instead of just poring through everything and reaching your own conclusion. If you did that, we'd all hit the same bullseye.
                  It's all good daze. I only brought up hair analysis to see if anyone knew if it was a valid consideration or not.

                  I won't be arguing with anyone about testing procedures. Unless either side can prove that they've actually studied it extensively in school or interviewed someone that we can all deem qualified, then it just becomes a contest of my google results are better than yours.

                  But for the record, I'll try remember

                  Hair analysis - daze says no.

                  Comment

                  • IMDAZED
                    Fair but Firm
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2006
                    • 42644
                    • 1,134
                    • 1,770
                    • 67,152

                    #89
                    Originally posted by AeKhuban
                    If you read the whole statement

                    "urine test alone can be used to detect the presence of recombinant EPO" is not the same with "only urine test can be used to detect the presence of recombinant EPO and blood test don't"

                    I think the second one is your interpretation that why you ask.. "why does WADA still blood test"

                    I post that from WADA site because my interpretation is that if we have two test. Namely urine test and blood test. If urine test alone can be used to detect PED then there is no need for the blood test.
                    Its like urine test detect x w and z and blood test detect x w and z also. If that is the result always there is no need for the blood test since the urine test is accurate.

                    I would like to add from the WADA site

                    This report also recommended that urine testing be used in conjunction with blood screening for a variety of reasons, including the cost savings of performing blood screening prior to testing urine. Some international sports federations still use both urine and blood matrix for the detection of EPO. Recently, the urine test was adapted to blood to perform detection of some new erythropoiesis stimulating agents.
                    They blood test because EPO (and other forms) disappear in a matter of hours but the effects don't. So if they don't get it on the urine, they'll notice the changes over time on the blood.

                    Comment

                    • brick wall
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 6480
                      • 259
                      • 35
                      • 24,574

                      #90
                      lol the peds boat has sailed again with the same people on board

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP