Calzaghe was a "slapper"?

[daggum]

You lose credibility when you talk about "low blows". I mean I acutally think you can be an intelligent poster who makes good points - even about that fight - but when you blatantly talk ***** to support your point, you lose credibility.

You cannot hit with an open glove, the inside of the glove, the wrist, the backhand, or the side of the hand.

you lose credibility when you talk about headbutts when 99 percent of the punches calzaghe throws are illegal. that's why i don't talk about ****** things like that when talking about fights. i talk about who landed the better punches not who faked low blows or who threw illegal punches.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

You cannot hit with an open glove, the inside of the glove, the wrist, the backhand, or the side of the hand.

you lose credibility when you talk about headbutts when 99 percent of the punches calzaghe throws are illegal. that's why i don't talk about ****** things like that when talking about fights. i talk about who landed the better punches not who faked low blows or who threw illegal punches.

Hopkins certainly landed the better punches. I cannot argue against that. But I think Calzaghe landed more punches...even if they were faaggy slaps. Ive never heard ur scorecard? I guess u scored Hopkins by a point or 2. Yet you have been on here for 2/3 years acting like it was a robbery?

[daggum]

Hopkins certainly landed the better punches. I cannot argue against that. But I think Calzaghe landed more punches...even if they were faaggy slaps. Ive never heard ur scorecard? I guess u scored Hopkins by a point or 2. Yet you have been on here for 2/3 years acting like it was a robbery?

calzaghe was outlanded by a wide margin in at least 7 of the rounds and i scored those rounds for hopkins. seems pretty simple to me. and another round was about even in lands but hopkins punches are much harder so you can probably give it to him. either way i don't see how it's possible to give calzaghe the fight if you score on clean punches.

maybe if you use your own totally incorrect scoring criteria you can have calzaghe winning but what's the point of scoring fights then? you are just gonna score the fight for the guy you want to win every time and i think that's what happened here. hopkins easily won the boxing match but people didn't like the way he did it so they punished him.

[Joeyzagz]

Hopkins looked lost out there against Calzaghe. Ive never seen Hopkins look so hopeless and fake as many injuries as he did in that fight.

[daggum]

Hopkins looked lost out there against Calzaghe. Ive never seen Hopkins look so hopeless and fake as many injuries as he did in that fight.

great breakdown of the fight. you really nailed all the scoring criteria.

scoring criteria 1-being lost
scoring criteria 2-faking injuries
scoring criteria 3-headbutts
scoring criteria 4-who does the crowd like more

[Dirk Diggler UK]

calzaghe was outlanded by a wide margin in at least 7 of the rounds and i scored those rounds for hopkins. seems pretty simple to me. and another round was about even in lands but hopkins punches are much harder so you can probably give it to him. either way i don't see how it's possible to give calzaghe the fight if you score on clean punches.

maybe if you use your own totally incorrect scoring criteria you can have calzaghe winning but what's the point of scoring fights then? you are just gonna score the fight for the guy you want to win every time and i think that's what happened here. hopkins easily won the boxing match but people didn't like the way he did it so they punished him.

So you scored it for Hopkins by a couple of points tops? In a fight with several swing rounds. Yet you've cried about this fight for years? Wow.