Comments Thread For: Bradley: Pacquiao is Being Fed Stiffs, I Can Beat Him!

[ny123]

Do you think Margarito or Cotto can make 147????!!!! lol

I think Cotto could still make 147

[hitking]

Pacwh*res trying to justify Pac not fighting top fighters by claiming they have no chance against Pac is extremely lame considering about 90% of fighters and trainers think Mayweather wipes his ass with Pac. Yet, they have no probably screaming to anyone who'll listen that Money is ducking Wapakman. According to Pacwh*re logic, Mayweather doesn't need to fight Pac because Pac can't beat him anyway right???

[damned1974]

I understand. The only thing we disagree on is that I feel Pac is 100% to blame because IMO, Arum is an EMPLOYEE of the Manny Pacquaio Co.

Fair enough....ultimately it is down to Manny's signature but I find it odd that Arum gives him a "raffle" of subpar opponents.Makes me wonder who wears the pants in that situation.

[damned1974]

I think Cotto could still make 147

Maybe he can...but how drained would he be?...he hasn't fought there since 2009 and is currently fighting at 154.

[-Lowkey-]

Look man-you are comparing chalk to cheese.Sure David Haye and Harrison sold well,but how much more would have sold if Haye fought Klitschko??????

Maidana is a better win based on what? Certainly not official rank,nor belts. He posed a threat based on the fact that he had a hard punch.Maybe we can agree to say that Kotelnik offered more of a reward than Maidana and was ranked higher at the time....if that is not a better win,Khan should trash his belt-lol

The Klitschkos are known in the UK Bradley is not.

Maidana is a better win based on the fact that Kotelnik was regarded by team khan ‘as the worst belt holder in boxing’ and an easy way to pick up a world title. Whereas Maidana was regarded as an extremely dangerous fight and a number of people thought Maidana would win via K.O. You are putting far to much emphasise on Rank and Belts.

[ny123]

Its sad for boxing that Bradley and Berto are the best guys to fight Pac at this point.

[HandSpeed303]

The facts are facts. Boxing is such a subjective sport that a person can basically take the facts and twist them to fit their stance. My stance is that Pac's recent run of opponents are laughable, and the facts support that.

Soooo, why lie about it then?

Margo was coming off a year penalty, and a fight he pretty much won every round after that...Did he deserve the fight? No, but why skip that fact?

Clottey (in alot of peoples veiw) beat Cotto, or at least should have got a draw. Also a win over Zab, where he pretty much controlled the entire fight. He lost to Cotto. I get that.

Cotto is, well Cotto. You don't have to agree with the catchweight, but please stop acting as if Cotto is some chump.

If you choose to pick apart his recent list of opponents, fine. You have that right, but don't leave out fact to make the fighter look worst. Or even try to down grade the opponent to fit your view. Two of those fights were not fights people wanted to see, no facts need to be twisted to support that agenda. That's the point.

[IMDAZED]

The Klitschkos are known in the UK Bradley is not.

I disagree. Any UK boxing fan knows Timothy Bradley.

[ny123]

Maybe he can...but how drained would he be?...he hasn't fought there since 2009 and is currently fighting at 154.

He has only had one fight at 154 and i think that had more to do with the opportunity to have a belt in another weight class then being drained at 47. In his last fight before Foreman he did come in at 145 and before that 146.

[-Lowkey-]

Maybe he can...but how drained would he be?...he hasn't fought there since 2009 and is currently fighting at 154.

The version of Cotto that Pac fought stops Bradley imo