Comments Thread For: Bradley: "If You're a Warrior, You Fight To The End!"

[Horus]

Here you are telling someone else not to inject theories in to YOUR post - but yet, that's what your doing, turning around and putting your OPINION in to someone elses posts.


Your not showing someone "the reality" of their logic, your trying to inject "YOUR REALITY" in to THEIR logic. Your so called logic isn't logical at all. In absolutely NO WAY, shape or form does comparing a woman being attacked by a rapist OR a serial killer or any other silly medifore you want to come up with regarding extreme acts of violence (where another person is NOT an agreeing party) - they don't equate in any way to a headbutt in boxing. To compare the two and to do it with such conviction that everyone else is blaming the "victim" is NONSENSE at the very least. Just because someone elses opinion doesn't match up to yours doesn't make it "reality".



Oh my goodness Horus.... just STOP

Here you are telling someone else not to inject theories in to YOUR post - but yet, that's what your doing, turning around and putting your OPINION in to someone elses posts.

Completely false. I prerequisite my analogy by saying "BY USING YOU LOGIC" and then I injected the reality. RL_GMA didnt prerequisite his post before he tried to twist my words up. So please follow what happen before you make accusations. Thank you.

Your not showing someone "the reality" of their logic, your trying to inject "YOUR REALITY" in to THEIR logic.
Hmm, What is it called when you used someone logic in a different situation or circumstance?

[Lorily]

Hmm, What is it called when you used someone logic in a different situation or circumstance?

AN OPINION. Your oppinion.

[Chief2ndzOnly!]

The point is the responsibility is not on the fighter to stop iHs opponent from doing something illegal. and as result of his opponent doing something illegal, the fighter should not be blame for being on the recieving end of a illegal action.

HEADBUTTS ARE ILLEGAL

Do you understand my dude.

STOP BLAMING THE VICTIM

Headbutts are not illegal. Intentional headbutts are illegal. We cannot discern from the footage that they are indeed intentional, therefore we have to err on the side that they are unintentional correct?

Devon is not a victim. Could devon have kept Tim's head away from his with an effective, consistant, and solid Jab? Yes or No Horus? I believe that he could have. Therefore excluding him from being a victim in this instance.

If you receive a low blow because you pulled your opponents head down as he was punching to the body you are NOT a victim of an illegal low blow. If he throws it to get you off of him and to buy himself so time it is THEN considered illegal. True or false.

Quit trying to crusade for a quitter bruh. Your stock is plummeting right along with Devon's with the argument that you are producing. Calling him a ****in victim when he was at fault for the clashes as well by not using his skills intelligently.

[Horus]

AN OPINION. Your oppinion.

Do you understand what my point is, while you are trying to defend someone else position?

My Point:
The point is the responsibility is not on the fighter to stop his opponent from doing something illegal. and as result of his opponent doing something illegal, the fighter should not be blame for being on the receiving end of a illegal action.

HEADBUTTS ARE ILLEGAL

Do you understand my dude.

My point is to STOP BLAMING THE VICTIM of illegal actions.

All of my analogy focus of the victims of illegal actions being blame instead of the doer of those illegal actions.

Now tell me why do you disagree with my point.
You disagree with my analogies, but why do you disagree with my point.

[jrosales13]

SMFH @ trying to compare a boxing fight to ****.

[RL_GMA]

Here you are telling someone else not to inject theories in to YOUR post - but yet, that's what your doing, turning around and putting your OPINION in to someone elses posts.

Completely false. I prerequisite my analogy by saying "BY USING YOU LOGIC" and then I injected the reality. RL_GMA didnt prerequisite his post before he tried to twist my words up. So please follow what happen before you make accusations. Thank you.

Your not showing someone "the reality" of their logic, your trying to inject "YOUR REALITY" in to THEIR logic.
Hmm, What is it called when you used someone logic in a different situation or circumstance?

Nobody twisted your words. YOU stated each of the headbutts Bradley landed on those 6 fighters caused a negative effect on each opponent. You made it clear that Bradley "Constantly" does this.

I then asked you if you believed those head butts caused for each of those fighters to lose? You never gave me a straight answer.

Also, provide proof Bradley's headbutts are intentional since you love FACTS

[Horus]

Headbutts are not illegal. Intentional headbutts are illegal. We cannot discern from the footage that they are indeed intentional, therefore we have to err on the side that they are unintentional correct?

Devon is not a victim. Could devon have kept Tim's head away from his with an effective, consistant, and solid Jab? Yes or No Horus? I believe that he could have. Therefore excluding him from being a victim in this instance.

If you receive a low blow because you pulled your opponents head down as he was punching to the body you are NOT a victim of an illegal low blow. If he throws it to get you off of him and to buy himself so time it is THEN considered illegal. True or false.

Quit trying to crusade for a quitter bruh. Your stock is plummeting right along with Devon's with the argument that you are producing. Calling him a ****in victim when he was at fault for the clashes as well by not using his skills intelligently.

Let me get this straight, you are trying to ask me to give the benefit of a doubt to a guy Tim Bradley who now has 6 opponents in a row, 6 Fights in a row, in which he has a headbutts average of 3 headbutts a fight on average.
Thats 18 headbutts in the past 6 fights . Sorry no B.O.D for Bradley from me. Thats 6 fights in a row now he has done this to his advantaged.

And you are asking me why I might lead on the side of this being more intentional than non-intentional?

BE SERIOUS! This is not a mistake, this not a coincidence, this is not a trend, this is a BEHAVIOR of Tim Bradley. Meaning this is apart of who he is.

Bradley style vs. All Styles is made for Headbutts

Alexander: SouthPaw ( Headbutted)
Abregu: Orthodox ( Headbutted)
Peterson: Orthodox ( Headbutted)
Campbell: Orthodox ( Headbutted)
Holt: Orthodox ( Headbutted)
Cherry: Orthodox ( Headbutted)

So what I want to know is what styles is vs bradley will not lead into bradley giving them a headbutt?

The answer is more than likely NONE, because Bradley has incorporated this tactic into his BEHAVIOR which is the problem. So please stop defending this guy for his headbutts, because it is obviously clear that HEADBUTTS are a "constant factor" in his victories over his opponents, and I want that factor removed.

[Check_hooks]

Tim throws headbutts on purpose. He does this every fight. In his last 6 fights hes all headbutted his opponent multiple times. Thats like you punching below the belt multiple times a fight. He does it early to cause a cut for his advantage.

If you're a warrior you win fights with your fists, not your headbutts.

[AntDawg]

Nobody twisted your words. YOU stated each of the headbutts Bradley landed on those 6 fighters caused a negative effect on each opponent. You made it clear that Bradley "Constantly" does this.

I then asked you if you believed those head butts caused for each of those fighters to lose? You never gave me a straight answer.

Also, provide proof Bradley's headbutts are intentional since you love FACTS

Man I have read this whole thread and find it funny how he still has not giving you a straight answer lol.

[Horus]

Tim throws headbutts on purpose. He does this every fight. In his last 6 fights hes all headbutted his opponent multiple times. Thats like you punching below the belt multiple times a fight. He does it early to cause a cut for his advantage.

If you're a warrior you win fights with your fists, not your headbutts.

Based on his past 6 fights, your post is a valid argument. Certainly not invalid.