Comments Thread For: Bradley: "If You're a Warrior, You Fight To The End!"

[Horus]

Isn't that the same thing?

Illegal and legal are two different things.

[PandaKilla]

Illegal and legal are two different things.

Well basically, if you're gonna stop them, then you're stopping them. Legal or not illegal.

[Cuauhtémoc1520]

Illegal and legal are two different things.

So are intentional and unintentional.

Bradley seems to lead with the head at times BUT the real question is does he do it on purpose to gain an advantage in fights?

Because unless you can determine that he does do it on purpose, then you have no case. I saw both men's heads come together, even on the last butt which caused the fight to be stopped.

[Horus]

Ok. Horus. Please dont use that analogy again. Find another one. No woman has a ref there to prevent fouls from taking place during a ****. Nor does she have the physical means(often times)to thwart and attacker.

Professional Boxing and **** Victims NEVER equate bruh.

My dude, I am telling you what your Logic can lead to, by you blaming the victim. Instead of you worrying about my analogy. How about you stop blaming the victim.

[Chief2ndzOnly!]

They are victims in boxing. You shouldnt be so naive to think otherwise.

You explain to me how Billy Collins jr isnt a victim

As I told you before, the consequences of your logic is dangerous.
Because it put's the duty of the victim to take responsibility for the attackers actions. Which is wrong in all aspects of life, including boxing.


It is not the other fighters responsibility to stop the other fighter from using illegal tactic's. It is their responsibility to stop their opponents for using legal tactic's. that is what boxing is about.

Yes. Collins was a victim. Loaded gloves are illegal in the sport of Boxing. Thats not the same as an unintentional headbutt bruh. It's just NOT.

As for the bolded. What the **** are you snortin Horus, sawdust?

[Horus]

Well basically, if you're gonna stop them, then you're stopping them. Legal or not illegal.

What is the difference between a fighter stoping a a fighter from clinching by hitting his opponents in the ****, or hitting his opponent to the body?

[PandaKilla]

What is the difference between a fighter stoping a a fighter from clinching by hitting his opponents in the ****, or hitting his opponent to the body?

I didn't read the rest of the pages. I see.

[Chief2ndzOnly!]

My dude, I am telling you what your Logic can lead to, by you blaming the victim. Instead of you worrying about my analogy. How about you stop blaming the victim.

Who is the VICTIM Horus???????? A Boxer who has the exact same tools as the other gotdamn Boxer across the ring from them? We aint talkin bout Resto or Margo. We talkin bout two Boxers that are in the ring on an even playing field, where the only thing that separates them is the amount of heart they have. Nothing else. Nobody's got loaded gloves, nobody's on PEDS(Atleast for now thats the concensus). It was about skills and heart in Pontiac on Saturday. If Devon's skills and heart woulda matched what the **** Kevin was running his mouth about Tim's head woulda been stuck to the ****in canvas bruh, from a Alexander uppercut(His sig punch).

Devon's only a victim of he's desire(or lack there of)to persevere. Thats all he's a victim of. He's a gotdamn Boxer, not a ****in ballerina bruh.

[Horus]

Yes. Collins was a victim. Loaded gloves are illegal in the sport of Boxing. Thats not the same as an unintentional headbutt bruh. It's just NOT.

As for the bolded. What the **** are you snortin Horus, sawdust?

The point is the responsibility is not on the fighter to stop his opponent from doing something illegal. and as result of his opponent doing something illegal, the fighter should not be blame for being on the receiving end of a illegal action.

HEADBUTTS ARE ILLEGAL

Do you understand my dude.

STOP BLAMING THE VICTIM

[Lorily]

Can you read?
Please stop trying to put your theories into my post. What I wrote is plain and clear. Go off that, and not what the hell you just wrote. Thank you

Once again
FACT 1:
His last 6 opponents were all headbutted multiple times in their fights with Bradley.

FACT 2:
All of them were affected by his headbutts

What we can all determine by these facts are that no matter how big or how small Bradley's headbutts played a "constant" role in his past 6 victories.

Here you are telling someone else not to inject theories in to YOUR post - but yet, that's what your doing, turning around and putting your OPINION in to someone elses posts.

I applied his logic and theory to another situation to show the consequences of him thinking the way he does. Nothing is wrong with showing someone the reality of their logic.

Your not showing someone "the reality" of their logic, your trying to inject "YOUR REALITY" in to THEIR logic. Your so called logic isn't logical at all. In absolutely NO WAY, shape or form does comparing a woman being attacked by a rapist OR a serial killer or any other silly medifore you want to come up with regarding extreme acts of violence (where another person is NOT an agreeing party) - they don't equate in any way to a headbutt in boxing. To compare the two and to do it with such conviction that everyone else is blaming the "victim" is NONSENSE at the very least. Just because someone elses opinion doesn't match up to yours doesn't make it "reality".

My dude, I am telling you what your Logic can lead to, by you blaming the victim. Instead of you worrying about my analogy. How about you stop blaming the victim.

Oh my goodness Horus.... just STOP