Marquez bros, Morales, Barrera, Pacquiao, Mayweather, and Hopkins are definitely higher than Cotto though, and you could throw in a lot of other guys in the discussion as well.
Would yall say that Winky Wright would be above Cotto?
No way Cotto is P4P better than Margs, yeah even Winky is higher than Cotto!
Hell Yeah, 1-Pac 2-Money 3-W.Klitchksco 4-V.Klitchksco 5-Cotto
He fought every top ww, except for um whats his name again? you know the "boxer" who's always on vacation...lol
No way Cotto is P4P better than Margs, yeah even Winky is higher than Cotto!
Margarito isnt even undefeated in his own division while Cotto rolled right through the lightwelterweight division and is doing his thing in the lighmiddleweight div.
Margarito isnt even undefeated in his own division while Cotto rolled right through the lightwelterweight division and is doing his thing in the lighmiddleweight div.
Cotto is the better P4Pounder
So what if he's not undefeated. He fought the best there were in the division. He never really skipped anyone like Cotto did. Cotto would of lost to Hatton/Mayweather at 140.
Beating a one legged Foreman and fighting Mayorga who is super washed up is doing his thing? ok whatever.
Margarito isnt even undefeated in his own division while Cotto rolled right through the lightwelterweight division and is doing his thing in the lighmiddleweight div.
Cotto is the better P4Pounder
I don't mind if people have Cotto over Margarito in terms of P4P. I can see it and I might even agree with it. Because, to me H2H doesn't really decide P4P.
But, being undefeated in a division has nothing to do with P4P.
And, to say he rolled right through the 140 division is a bit misleading. Since he didn't fight the best in that division. And, had a couple fights where he went life and death against 2nd-3rd tier opponents.
Comment