Comments Thread For: David Haye's Klitschko Hopes Derailed By Adamek's Hustle

[No1]

hyae can still fight a klit. Vitali will batter solis and wlad will batter chisora. That leaves one to fight adamek and the other free to pursue other fights. I know for sure if wlad fights adamek then haye will have nothing to do with vitali.

Haye wets his bed at night when he realises even with his best hayemaker big vitali will still laugh at him.

[dvb]

no,lol,adamek no hussler.

wlad is the hussler,he ducked signing,chickened to a novice in chisora,and then blocked up a future haye fight late on this year by using adamek.

and i bet it will be vitali v adamek!.

lets just hope summer time is either:

haye v vitali

adamek v wlad.

OR

wlad v haye

vitali v adamek.

[DamonJJ]

Adamek is a warrior. Signs to fight EITHER Klitschko.

Klitschkos are warriors cause they signed for EITHER one to fight Adamek just so EITHER can fight Haye.

It's OBVIOUS Haye is the one most to blame for not making things happen.

[Dave Rado]

David Haye's hopes of securing a career-defining fight against one of the Klitschko brothers have been further undermined after Poland's Tomasz Adamek beat him to the punch.

[Click Here To Read More]

I don't know who "Boxing Clever" is (the author of the article) but he or she doesn't have a clue what he/she is talking about. The K bros have left both the July and September dates open for one of them to fight Haye, and in the unlikely event that Haye grows some balls and agrees to fight one of them, the other brother will fight Adamek. That's why the Adamek contract was only to fight one of the brothers and didn't specify which brother. All Haye has to do is man up and sign, and he can fight whichever Klitschko he wants.

Boxingscene really shouldn't publish such poorly researched articles, it is a serious lowering of their standards.

[Dave Rado]

Personally, I always thought that K2 wanted that fight more than Haye.....
but Chisora, WTF? And now Wlad's talking about Adamek when he knows that Haye already has his retirement date - unreasonable or not - pencilled in for October..... WTF?

Is Wlad trying to palm Haye off onto Vitali ?

As for the Chisora fight, see here. I don't blame him and it has nothing whatsoever to do with Haye pulling out.

Wlad has gone out of his way to keep both the July and September dates open to fight Haye, and has made it clear that if Haye grows some balls and signs to fight him, then Vitali will fight Adamek, not Wlad. (Alternatively, if Haye prefers to fight Vitali, in either July or September, then it will be Wlad who fights Adamek). That's why Adamek had to sign to fight one of the brothers and couldn't specify which one.

There is nothing whatsoever to stop Haye from signing now to fight one of the brothers (whichever brother he prefers) in July or September (whichever month he prefers) - other than the fact that he doesn't want to fight either of them (which he has stated in so many words).

[Dave Rado]

Haye can still fight Vitaly. What's the problem ... Haye, of course. Seeing what V did to Briggs put some unholy fear in his heart.

Haye can still fight Wlad. He just doesn't want to fight either of them.

[Gratide]

Well I certainly don't blame the K's , Haye refuses to fight anyone that is a serious threat . Paper champion !

[guru]

its a mute point if haye fights chageav in may cuz he will end up losing

[Walt Liquor]

lol at haye's "long pursuit" of the klitschkos

[Lorily]

Yeah, yeah David.... it's all Adameks fault. LMAO!