Because again he didn't have the mental aspect of being embarrassed and losing to the best at that time. Hatton was done before Pac fought him. Beating feather fisted Pauli is not worth my time. As for the drugs I wouldn't put it past him as I've watched him talk about how he was in a dark place after losing etc. But what ever. I called it as the fight EXACTLY went. To the tee... research you will see.
I said Diaz was shyt because he ducked Cambell Soup, Hoya was shyt because I know based off of Roach that Hoya was shot and hadn't made 147 in nearly a decade, Clottey was just a punching bag that didn't fight yet "fought" under the banner of Top rank (reason the fight was made), Margarito was a disgrace and Mosley is old and had to beg for years, lose, and leave GBP just to get a fight. That is why they are shyt and disappointing.
Pac vs JMM AT 140 is better than Mosley who hasn't won a fight in 2 years who will be 40 years old. Styles make fights.
Well what I'm saying is that Pac vs JMM III AT 140 is better than Pac vs Mosley. The majority of people, fans, experts, media agree on this.
You're all over the place, I didn't say why Cotto was shit. Because, you said it was cool. I asked the reason Pac and the rest were shit was because you picked him to win. Which by that logic since I'm sure you picked Floyd to win all of his fights then all of his are shit as well.
Of couse it doesn't make it OK. I even said "doesn't make it OK". And, at 140 is not fair and not better than Mosley.
What do you mean who cares? I'm going by what you're saying. I'm not going by what other say. If I want to talk about what other say then I will talk to the ones who said it. Who is everyone? Am I everyone? Focus man. Don't be all over the place.
Comment