Comments Thread For: Mikkel Kessler Jabs Carl Froch: Remember I Beat You!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BennyST
    Shhhh...
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2007
    • 9263
    • 1,036
    • 500
    • 21,301

    #41
    I love how hindsight, and Froch's never ending rants, has changed from the majority saying that Kessler took a good close decision win that he deserved to all these fools ranting that it now wasn't a win at all and that anywhere else he would have lost.

    Ahhhh, no. Anywhere else, but Nottingham, he would have won the same way. Kessler took it and people have really got to stop rehashing history just because the fighter that lost says that in his hometown he would have won......Well, guess what guys? He's right. He's already won a bad decision there that he probably shouldn't have and another one would have been fine with him. However, the right decision went the right way.

    I've never really understood why people keep talking as if Froch won and was robbed in a hometown decision. It would have been worse if Froch won that fight because Kessler did take it clearer than Froch did.

    I love Froch and his talk, but this one things about him annoys the ****e out of me. He can't get over the fact that he lost a fight fair and square and has to chalk it down to a 'hometown decision'. Come on....It would have been just as much, actually more so, of a hometown decision if that fight went his way in Nottingham. He doesn't mind that though.

    Comment

    • Hitman932
      I LOVE Euro Fighters!!
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 14910
      • 1,180
      • 836
      • 28,259

      #42
      Originally posted by BennyST
      I love how hindsight, and Froch's never ending rants, has changed from the majority saying that Kessler took a good close decision win that he deserved to all these fools ranting that it now wasn't a win at all and that anywhere else he would have lost.

      Ahhhh, no. Anywhere else, but Nottingham, he would have won the same way. Kessler took it and people have really got to stop rehashing history just because the fighter that lost says that in his hometown he would have won......Well, guess what guys? He's right. He's already won a bad decision there that he probably shouldn't have and another one would have been fine with him. However, the right decision went the right way.

      I've never really understood why people keep talking as if Froch won and was robbed in a hometown decision. It would have been worse if Froch won that fight because Kessler did take it clearer than Froch did.

      I love Froch and his talk, but this one things about him annoys the ****e out of me. He can't get over the fact that he lost a fight fair and square and has to chalk it down to a 'hometown decision'. Come on....It would have been just as much, actually more so, of a hometown decision if that fight went his way in Nottingham. He doesn't mind that though.

      All that being said if Andre Ward wins the Super 6 there is no reason at all for him to fight Kessler again.

      Who the hell wants to see a rematch of such a one sided beatdown?

      Kessler has no claim to make Ward fight anywhere outside of the USA and when Ward beats his ass like a red headed stepchild all the people who made excuses for Kessler's initial pathetic performance will just make the same lame excuses all over again.

      Ward-Kessler II would be the most pointless rematch since Margarito fought Kermit Cintron in a rematch after Cintron quit the first time around.

      If Froch should win the Super 6 (not very likely) then by all means let Kessler fight him. However if it is Ward then nobody wants to see that rematch in lieu of Ward-Bute.

      Comment

      • Visceral
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2010
        • 1169
        • 37
        • 37
        • 7,770

        #43
        I'd like to see Kessler fight Bute. It's the best challenge for both of them, and there's no way anybody can say the winner doesn't deserve the super six winner. Let's hope it happens.

        Comment

        • AnthrAxNSB
          Up and Comer
          Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
          • Oct 2008
          • 84
          • 2
          • 4
          • 6,664

          #44
          Originally posted by BennyST
          I love how hindsight, and Froch's never ending rants, has changed from the majority saying that Kessler took a good close decision win that he deserved to all these fools ranting that it now wasn't a win at all and that anywhere else he would have lost.

          Ahhhh, no. Anywhere else, but Nottingham, he would have won the same way. Kessler took it and people have really got to stop rehashing history just because the fighter that lost says that in his hometown he would have won......Well, guess what guys? He's right. He's already won a bad decision there that he probably shouldn't have and another one would have been fine with him. However, the right decision went the right way.

          I've never really understood why people keep talking as if Froch won and was robbed in a hometown decision. It would have been worse if Froch won that fight because Kessler did take it clearer than Froch did.

          I love Froch and his talk, but this one things about him annoys the ****e out of me. He can't get over the fact that he lost a fight fair and square and has to chalk it down to a 'hometown decision'. Come on....It would have been just as much, actually more so, of a hometown decision if that fight went his way in Nottingham. He doesn't mind that though.
          ...Agreed...

          Comment

          • ShoulderRoll
            Join The Great Resist
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 56176
            • 10,136
            • 5,032
            • 763,445

            #45
            Originally posted by madamfackah
            Kessler is the Emeritus champion, remember?

            He vacated that title and left it in the Super6, he never lost it. He has the right to fight the WBC champ.
            It looks like he's pulling a fast one, taking time off while the other Super Six participants beat the crap out of each other.

            Comment

            • BarrySlisk
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Aug 2007
              • 438
              • 24
              • 12
              • 6,543

              #46
              Originally posted by youngmoney007
              Kessler has no legs, it was clear when he fought Froch that soon as Froch opened up on him he hurt him and the "Dane" was hanging on for his life. Had the last round gone 30 seconds more Carl would have stretched him for sure... Bute would knock him out and so would Hopkins...
              It was Kessler who was knocking Froch about in the final seconds so that does not make sense at all.

              Comment

              • BarrySlisk
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Aug 2007
                • 438
                • 24
                • 12
                • 6,543

                #47
                Originally posted by El C@cique@PR
                Co Sign!!!!!!!!!! Kesler probably was injure but he was sneaky to get out of the tournament and facing the winner without going through the grueling tournament. Bute vs Kessler should be next
                Right, Kessler was so scared of A. Green that he ran...No wait...You're a dumbass !!!

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP