The Klitschko's Are The Most Dominant.........!

[jimmy1569]

The Klitschko's resume suck. I don't care about their knock out ratio or record, the fact is they don't have a single great win on their resumes. Anybody can look good fighting bums.

Tyson, Ali, Lewis, Holyfield, Louis, Dempsey, Marciano, Foreman, Frazier... All these guys have a way bettter resume than the Klitschkos combined. The Klitschko ain't **** compared to previous greats.

Nobody in America even knows them, much less cares about them. Ask a random American on the street who the klitschkos is and he'll say WHO?.... if you asked a random american in the 90's who Tyson or Holyfield or Lewis was and he'd for sure know of them.

Wlad plays it safe and jabs 90% of the fight and stops his opponents late even though they never have a chance. What a ****in joke... Tyson would smash guys like Peters or Chagaev or Chambers in a few rounds max.

Wlad is the most boring heavyweight champ of all time... Even more boring than Lewis, and he could be boring as hell. But atleast he had a few exciting fights unlike Wlad who has only looked exciting when he lost.

The Klitschkos are ruining the sport, nobody in America wants to see their lame boring ass fights against bums.

Truth is all those fighters you mentioned wouldn't be as dominant with the fighters the Klitschko's have faced that you think they should've put away more spectacularly. You just see how dominant they are that they should be knocking out fighters sooner rather than later. ThOSE greats wouldn't be as dominant with said fighters & therefore it would be more exciting & perhaps they'll get a knockout sooner rather than later but understand it';s out of necessity because they don't have the luxury of waiting so the life of their opponent gets taken away. The Klitschko's get their man 86% of the time...the other fighters you mentioned don't & the bottom line is the results..not highlight reels & FYI the Klityschko's KNOCKOUTS are just as exciting as anyone elses as when they go for the finish there's no one more destructive so all that stuff you're talking about boring & unexciting is actually an adjective for dominance. Dominance can be perceived that way sometimes when you have no competition. LARRY hOLMES was also just winning but he wasn't getting knockouts at the end of the day like the brothers are.. Now that was boring.

[WladIsTheChamp]

This should be the stuff of moviemaking legend. 2 BROS kicking ass all over the ****ing place. Instead...they are ridiculed by mainstream fans despite doing almost everything right. You want knockouts...they give you that at a record shattering pace. You want the sweet science in between those knockouts... they're just as dominant there. No one has ever combined the sweet science (boxing clinic) with the stoppages like they have. If THEY were born & bred in the United STATES...IT'D BE A hollywood ending that would be even more revered than Tyson or ALI>>> THE 2 MOST famous fighters in the history of the sport.

I think Americans don't like them because they don't fit a certain demographic and/or are not American. Plus they haven't: ****d anyone, robbed anyone, said racist things, beat up their girlfriends, spent time in jail on a weapons charge, did drugs. They aren't tattooted, they are PhD, speak multiple languages. **** that, they are boring as **** now that you mention it. WTF is wrong those Klitschko bros? They have no personality!- or so the idiots say

[PrinceNaz88]

& can you explain why Vitali lived to fight another day & lennox didn't? Lewis got the beating of his life that he vowed never to step into a ring again. Funny..when he got the W over the Baddest MAN on the PLanet one fight prior...he was more than happy to face him again for less money than HE WOULD'VE GOTTEN to face THE REAL BADDEST MAN ON THE PLANET... nUFF said about Lennox's retirement plans.

You are mental.

[Steak]

I think Americans don't like them because they don't fit a certain demographic and/or are not American. Plus they haven't: ****d anyone, robbed anyone, said racist things, beat up their girlfriends, spent time in jail on a weapons charge, did drugs. They aren't tattooted, they are PhD, speak multiple languages. **** that, they are boring as **** now that you mention it. WTF is wrong those Klitschko bros? They have no personality!- or so the idiots say

Honestly, the reason a lot of people dislike the Klitschko bros on these forums is because of their insane fans.
Also Vlad has had a few stinkers, but his KOs more than make up for that to me.


The only thing I dislike about Pacquiao are some of his rabid, delusional fans.

[jimmy1569]

I think Americans don't like them because they don't fit a certain demographic and/or are not American. Plus they haven't: ****d anyone, robbed anyone, said racist things, beat up their girlfriends, spent time in jail on a weapons charge, did drugs. They aren't tattooted, they are PhD, speak multiple languages. **** that, they are boring as **** now that you mention it. WTF is wrong those Klitschko bros? They have no personality!- or so the idiots say

Look...drama sells...it's just the world we're living in. You can look at there careers to see it. Their 5 losses have gotten more play than their 96 w's as they all ended in dramatic & exciting fashion. We focus on those losses because 95% of the time they're simply dominant. They are a victim of their own greatness. The haters try to tear down their strengths by focusing on competition & the manner in which they've rarely lost.

The haters are admitting their greatness by doing this. They just don't see it because they're engulfed in the hatred.

[jimmy1569]

You are mental.

I might be mental, son but i sure as hell bring more to the table than "You are mental") & remember you're here responding to this thread because of the fact i'm "mental">>> salut!

[jimmy1569]

Honestly, the reason a lot of people dislike the Klitschko bros on these forums is because of their insane fans.
Also Vlad has had a few stinkers, but his KOs more than make up for that to me.


The only thing I dislike about Pacquiao are some of his rabid, delusional fans.

LOOK.,... i'm not buying that as that's a copout.. You don't HATE something because another person loves it... you hate it because you hate it. It could stem from jealousy of someone's success...not wanting to acknowledge it or simply just not giving credit where credit it's due. You have your own reasons for thinking the Klitschko's are more hype than substance & that's fine but to blame it on the fans who don't think in this manner is just simply making up excuses for your own dislike of the brothers.

[PrinceNaz88]

I might be mental, son but i sure as hell bring more to the table than "You are mental") & remember you're here responding to this thread because of the fact i'm "mental">>> salut!

Lewis retired because he wanted to. Just admit it Jim, Vitali has never beaten the same calibre of opponents to be classed as great as Lewis.

[Sweet Jesus]

Why do people always combine their accomplishments?

OMG! Tyson and Ali are the most dominant...!

[jimmy1569]

Lewis retired because he wanted to. Just admit it Jim, Vitali has never beaten the same calibre of opponents to be classed as great as Lewis.

Look..son... it's NOT Vitali's fault that he didn't have similar opponents that Lennox faced a decade earlier. All I have to go on is how they fought each other for 6 rds & the dismantling of the other OPPONENTS they did face. They obviosly didn't face the same opponents but that doesn't change the fact Vitali has the better numbers than Lewis against all other opponents & clearly outboxed Lennox when they fought each other.

Vitali has also won versions of the belt 3 different times just like LEnnox. One fighter never faced the comp another fighter.... so the logical way to see who's better is to give the fighter that fought the perceived better comp the edge.

All logic to me at least states that Vitali would've gotten the same results WITHOUT being ktfo twice along the way. If Lewis gets the nod because he faced better comp..something vitali never had the priviledge of facing & this is used against Vitali UNFAIRLY...THEN I'LL JUST go to the numbers which states Vitali WAS more dominant against foes he did face through no fault of his own.

As you can see it's just opinionated subjective that goes both ways. The only real thing we have to distinguish who was better was the 6 rds they fought each other.. all that other stuff is pure speculation based on their competition & NOT their skills which IMO should always be the deciding factor in any argument in ANY sport when judging athletes from different eras. Too much emphasis gets placed on opposition & NOT enough emphasis gets placed on the actual fighter.