Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Horus Presents: SLICK FIGHTER 101 "SLICKOLOGY"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    JMM is a slick fighter by definition.

    Pac is not a slick fighter. Just a ped abusing cheater who fights at catchweights.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by pistol whip View Post
      Horus you are not a trainer, former boxer, nor are you crediable source of boxing knowledge.

      So please tell me why in the world would anyone actually think you have any ***ing idea what you are talking about?
      Look man, I am not a doctor, scientist, quantum physicist, or a professional fighter. However I do have eyes. As a result of what I am seeing and the amount of time I spent following styles of certain fighters. I can say for certainty that I am right about this. as I was once told, Einstein wasn't born with his theories intact. No one was ever great merely by chance. At some point, work had to be worked, knowledge had to be learned, and talent had to be skilled.

      So with this is mind, when it comes to the sport of Boxing, people can trust I put the work in to write a thread like this, and they can believe what I write is based in reason and facts. Therefore should be apart of the Gospel of boxing theories.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Horus View Post
        Look man, I am not a doctor, scientist, quantum physicist, or a professional fighter. However I do have eyes. As a result of what I am seeing and the amount of time I spent following styles of certain fighters. I can say for certainty that I am right about this. as I was once told, Einstein wasn't born with his theories intact. No one was ever great merely by chance. At some point, work had to be worked, knowledge had to be learned, and talent had to be skilled.

        So with this is mind, when it comes to the sport of Boxing, people can trust I put the work in to write a thread like this, and they can believe what I write is based in reason and facts. Therefore should be apart of the Gospel of boxing theories.
        would you call Amir, slick?

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Horus View Post
          Look man, I am not a doctor, scientist, quantum physicist, or a professional fighter. However I do have eyes. As a result of what I am seeing and the amount of time I spent following styles of certain fighters. I can say for certainty that I am right about this. as I was once told, Einstein wasn't born with his theories intact. No one was ever great merely by chance. At some point, work had to be worked, knowledge had to be learned, and talent had to be skilled.

          So with this is mind, when it comes to the sport of Boxing, people can trust I put the work in to write a thread like this, and they can believe what I write is based in reason and facts. Therefore should be apart of the Gospel of boxing theories.
          Did you really compare yourself to Einstein? Well if Einstein was a half ******ed mouthbreathing mongoloid that was blind as a bat yeah maybe I could see the comparison!

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by wazaa. View Post
            would you call Amir, slick?
            No. Neither should you.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Horus View Post
              Look man, I am not a doctor, scientist, quantum physicist, or a professional fighter. However I do have eyes. As a result of what I am seeing and the amount of time I spent following styles of certain fighters. I can say for certainty that I am right about this. as I was once told, Einstein wasn't born with his theories intact. No one was ever great merely by chance. At some point, work had to be worked, knowledge had to be learned, and talent had to be skilled.

              So with this is mind, when it comes to the sport of Boxing, people can trust I put the work in to write a thread like this, and they can believe what I write is based in reason and facts. Therefore should be apart of the Gospel of boxing theories.
              no man

              you're biased just like everyone on here. Just because people don't go all Iliad and Homer on here does not make them any less or any more enough to where your biased opinions oversee theirs

              you have favorites whether it's style fighter gloves etc etc you have favorites

              and you parlay them into your arguments 99% of the time

              Gospel should be something that all can accept as true and from a source that is pure with knowledge. Not to diss but you're far from that.

              and your description of what a slick fighter is has more holes swiss cheese

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Horus View Post
                Look man, I am not a doctor, scientist, quantum physicist, or a professional fighter. However I do have eyes. As a result of what I am seeing and the amount of time I spent following styles of certain fighters. I can say for certainty that I am right about this. as I was once told, Einstein wasn't born with his theories intact. No one was ever great merely by chance. At some point, work had to be worked, knowledge had to be learned, and talent had to be skilled.

                So with this is mind, when it comes to the sport of Boxing, people can trust I put the work in to write a thread like this, and they can believe what I write is based in reason and facts. Therefore should be apart of the Gospel of boxing theories.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Horus View Post
                  No. Neither should you.
                  is pirog slick?

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by onechance87 View Post
                    is pirog slick?
                    No one is slick unless Horus says they are. Didn't you know this?

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Horus View Post
                      No. Neither should you.
                      If Amir isn't slick then so isn't Devon Alexander. Devon doesn't have any headmovement, his footwork is limited and he can't adapt.

                      What would you call Amir's style then? Amir is a natural counter-puncher though.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP