apparently you people have no idea what 'slick' means in a boxing sense. let me educate you.
SLICK means smooth and glossy, which makes you slippery and hard to hold on to and hit. If you cant call a fighter slippery, than you cant call them slick.
Can you honestly call Judah, Mitchell or Corley slippery? I sure as hell cant.
you throw Mayweather in there with a TRUE SLICK SLIPPERY FIGHTER like a prime Cory Spinks or prime Mayweather, and Mayweather gets embarressed.
you guys are on another planet. slick is nothing more then a great defensive guy who's hard to read (& hard to catch cleanly) & has very good speed & fundamentals.....pac doesn't fit this bill. the funny thing is mayweather didn't even fight judah "slickly" nore would he have fought cory spinks slickly. he turned himself into a come forward body & head puncher in that judah fight. now he would indeed fight pac slickly....
no, you are right, but publicist are using it to hype the May-Pac fight.
Pac never fought a dumb and boring slick fighter. he aint the truth bla bla bla
its a money-word.
I get that, the whole thing about truly slick guys (that are actually good at it) is they give everyone issues. if they didn't present issues for guys they would not be slick.
So people coming up with this to dog Pacquiao are not saying anything special because slick guys tend to give everyone problems. People just want to see if he can overcome that if he can that leaves zero questions about him at least talking in a boxing ring.
You have a lot of love for Zab I get it but you let your love is clouding your mind.
If you think he tries or not is completely different matter.
He is not slick.
did you watch my vid you dip****. You are a typical *******, you know **** about boxing. You have probably only seen 3-4 fights of zab judah. He is one of the slickest fighters in history.
I don't know who have less boxing knowledge. Klitschkonians or *******s
zab judah is a slick fighter. There is no debate about that.
skip to 1:35 watch until the end of that round
Forget it. *******s now can determine what slick is and it's what they say. I mean their argument is Cotto in the Margarito fight.
As you can see they're going on record saying Pacquiao is facing a slick African American fighter in Shane Mosley. If Mosley is a slick boxer then you know you're debating with ******s. Mosley the self proclaimed half Mexican, because of his come forward style...is now slick according to *******s.
You have a lot of love for Zab I get it but you let your love is clouding your mind.
If you think he tries or not is completely different matter.
He is not slick.
I don't love Judah at all, he is alright when properly motivated and prepared but his discipline is lacking and he doesn't have the gumption to stick a plan out to completion.
That is the type of fighter he is, if you can't see that I have to question your whole view on Judah~ because you understand little about him other than he is not great.
did you watch my vid you dip****. You are a typical *******, you know **** about boxing. You have probably only seen 3-4 fights of zab judah. He is one of the slickest fighters in history.
I don't know who have less boxing knowledge. Klitschkonians or *******s
Bi-polar mofo.
First you green me for boxing knowledge a couple weeks ago, now I don't have any boxing knowledge
Comment