Originally posted by Parodius
Who do you think is the biggest nut hugger in NSB forum
Collapse
-
I think that 98% (percent) of the men (and the few women that inhabit this site) Are nuthuggers in some form or another. How many of you get all upset when someone says something you don't like about a fighter or refers to the fighter as a ***** or a ho. How many of you get upset when someone says something you don't like about the fighter, which forces you to resort to namecalling because you are angry? I would say 98%.
1. Some are nationalistic nuthuggers. Puerto Rico is best, Mexico is best Europe is best blah blah blah.
2. Some have favorite fighters and will defend them till they die
3. and some are gay and are actually in love (fatal attractions heheh)Comment
-
Originally posted by RunWithKnivesJuyJuy is beyond the biggest nuthugger on this forum. He is the biggest nuthugger on the internet bar none. The guy makes five Eubank threads a day.
oh. and no offense.Comment
-
Originally posted by JUYJUYThis is coming from a guy who called world-class fighters such as Herol Graham and Ayub Kalule "bums" and laughs at Michael Watson being beaten up and disabled. As I've said many times in the past, your a very sick man jabsRstiff.
This is how a person who knows he's wrong argues...
He changes up what you've said, distorts things, basically lies.
I have never said that Graham or Kalule were "bums"...not even close.
I said Kalule was WASHED-UP by '86, & his record proves that. I acknowledge that he was a truly outstanding fighter IN HIS PRIME.
His prime was 80-81...
Same for Graham. I have always acknowledged Graham's abilities, but when you have a nutlicker like JUYJUY goind overboard about him, I try to bring him down to the level he belongs.
The worst lie in his post is that I have made fun of Watson's condition. All I've done is revel in Mike McCallum's destruction of Watson...which it was- total domination. I revel in it to disturb ol' JUYJUY. I have said it's possible that the awful beating Watson suffered against McCallum had effects on Watson that lead to his present condition.
I have never made reference to his fight with Eubank, & the tragic results of that bout.
JUYJUY is a *****, resorting to these "tactics". He resorted to them because I cosistently shut him down, & he has nothing for me.Comment
-
Give it up jabsRstiff, your not fooling anyone.
Kalule was mentioned as Hagler's next opponent before he fought Graham, and his best ever win came in 1986 in the fight before he fought Graham (you know, when he made Kalambay look bad!). So Kaule was in his prime when he fought Graham (you know, when he could barely lay a glove on Graham, when Graham then became #1 contender before Hagler-Leonard).Last edited by JUYJUY; 09-07-2005, 07:30 AM.Comment
-
Whatever....
He was beaten by a ten-fight VETERAN in Davey Moore....& was beaten silly by McCallum.
But....he was in his prime because he beat Sumbu Kalambay ?
Only in your world, sunshine.Comment
-
Originally posted by jabsRstiffWhatever....
He was beaten by a ten-fight VETERAN in Davey Moore....& was beaten silly by McCallum.
But....he was in his prime because he beat Sumbu Kalambay ?
Only in your world, sunshine.
You can't change what happened, as much as you want to
You cannot change the fact that Sugar Ray Leonard says that his most difficult ever win was Kalule.Comment
-
Originally posted by JUYJUYHe lost to Moore and McCallum in 1982 in their backyards, but by 1985 he hit his prime and made Kalambay look bad! Then came Graham who embarassed him into retirement in what was a shockingly great performance from Bomber that no doubt scared the living **** out of Hagler.
You can't change what happened, as much as you want to
You cannot change the fact that Sugar Ray Leonard says that his most difficult ever win was Kalule.
You have stated it was Eubank-Watson, maybe Eubank-Benn, that made you a fight fan.
I have been a fight fan since right before Leonard fough Kalule.
I have a greater frame of reference than you. You're getting your **** second to fifth-handed, by some really biased fight people.
I live in Philadelphia....so, I'm going to be like you .....& tell everyone that Herol Graham was in his prime when he was KO'd by Charles Brewer.
Yeah...Graham was coming off a big win, perhaps his best, over Chris Johnson.
I'll just ignore the KO's he suffered, & the time past before he beat Johnson.
But,all of you here in the forum need to know....Charles Brewer,
my Philly boy, beat Graham when Graham was at his best.Last edited by jabsRstiff; 09-07-2005, 08:01 AM.Comment
-
brewer repeatedly called out RJ, but never got the fight... although i think RJ would have killed him, brewer may have been too dangerous an opponent for jones(compared to the bums jones was fighting, like frazier, brannon, hall, etc.)Comment
-
Originally posted by jabsRstiffI have acknowledged, REPEATEDLY YOU ASSWIPE, that Kalambay did give Ray a tough, tough night. When have I ever said otherwise ?
You have stated it was Eubank-Watson, maybe Eubank-Benn, that made you a fight fan.
I have been a fight fan since right before Leonard fough Kalule.
I have a greater frame of reference than you. You're getting your **** second to fifth-handed, by some really biased fight people.
I live in Philadelphia....so, I'm going to be like you .....& tell everyone that Herol Graham was in his prime when he was KO'd by Charles Brewer.
Yeah...Graham was coming off a big win, perhaps his best, over Chris Johnson.
I'll just ignore the KO's he suffered, & the time past before he beat Johnson.
But,all of you here in the forum need to know....Charles Brewer,
my Philly boy, beat Graham when Graham was at his best.
But Graham retired him, Kalule was planning to go on for much longer because he was in such good form but Graham retired him with a sizzling performance. I suppose Kalule losing to Graham is a little like the Hamed losing to Barrera (he got embarassed and hid away).Comment
Comment