how dumb is boxrec

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kmac
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Feb 2005
    • 109
    • 4
    • 0
    • 6,410

    #21
    boxrec is bad,

    but so is the wbc, ibf, and wba rankings

    Comment

    • - Evil -
      I Am A ****sexual
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Jan 2005
      • 807
      • 32
      • 33
      • 7,253

      #22
      Originally posted by kmac
      boxrec is bad,

      but so is the wbc, ibf, and wba rankings
      All rankings are biased, i hear some people say the ring magazine isnt bias but it is if your not from the US. One organisation had a decent ranking system, it was the IBO, shame its not considered a decent belt because from what i remember they were fair.

      Comment

      • Bozo_no no
        Palabras de Piedra
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2005
        • 8906
        • 416
        • 496
        • 16,069

        #23
        What's with all the hating on Boxrec?

        Yea, their rankings aren't credible, but they don't claim to be. They're working on an ongoing basis to develope a points and ratings system.

        It's an incredible data base, and a very valuable tool.

        It's a credit to boxing fans everywhere.

        Comment

        • masterdirector
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2005
          • 4957
          • 237
          • 376
          • 5,664

          #24
          Boxrec also changes fighters' records sometimes. I know there were a couple guys, name guys, who had fought Reggie Strickland and later it was removed from both records. And I'm 100 percent positive that they changed the record of that Wlad Klitschko opponent in his first fight either after the Sanders loss or Brewster loss, can't remember for sure. Guy's name was Moli or something like that.

          That guy had like 10-11 losses. I went and looked up his record the day he was mentioned as Klitschko's probable opponent. Then, a few weeks later, his record had been changed because he only had like 3 losses.

          I guarantee promoters or someone pays off boxrec to change their **** if they need to make an opponent look better.

          Comment

          • bigdlb12
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2004
            • 9688
            • 626
            • 365
            • 19,901

            #25
            Originally posted by riz
            look at their rankings for light welter
            1 ricky
            2pbf
            3kostya
            4. gatti
            5 freitas
            6. maussa
            7 harris
            8 witter
            9 julio diaz
            10 souleyman m'bay
            11 norio kiuma
            then at 12 they have cotto


            dont u think thats kinda retarted?
            yeah i do, I think that Cotto should not even be up there

            Comment

            • oldgringo
              Ellis
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jul 2004
              • 12747
              • 968
              • 453
              • 30,064

              #26
              Half of the people on this forum wouldn't be able to hold their end of an argument without boxrec.

              "Oh yeah well..........*pause pause looks at boxrec for a fight result*.......Michael Moorer was undefeated as a light heavyweight and thats why he was the greatest ever"

              Comment

              • Memorex
                King of Kings
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2004
                • 5346
                • 360
                • 380
                • 13,864

                #27
                Originally posted by oldgringo
                Half of the people on this forum wouldn't be able to hold their end of an argument without boxrec.

                "Oh yeah well..........*pause pause looks at boxrec for a fight result*.......Michael Moorer was undefeated as a light heavyweight and thats why he was the greatest ever"

                lmao very true

                Comment

                • - Evil -
                  I Am A ****sexual
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Jan 2005
                  • 807
                  • 32
                  • 33
                  • 7,253

                  #28
                  Originally posted by oldgringo
                  Half of the people on this forum wouldn't be able to hold their end of an argument without boxrec.

                  "Oh yeah well..........*pause pause looks at boxrec for a fight result*.......Michael Moorer was undefeated as a light heavyweight and thats why he was the greatest ever"

                  So true, i'd like to know how many people quickly check boxrec before they write something.

                  Comment

                  • riz
                    T }-{ E /\/\0DeL
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2003
                    • 2804
                    • 82
                    • 108
                    • 10,155

                    #29
                    Originally posted by bigdlb12
                    yeah i do, I think that Cotto should not even be up there
                    hahahha wow u must be dumb lol...... jus playing
                    who would u put up there instead then?

                    Comment

                    • Manny_P
                      Knicks/Yankees/Giants
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • May 2005
                      • 8966
                      • 542
                      • 799
                      • 19,102

                      #30
                      its as dumb as RunMyMouth's boxing NOledge! nyahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahaha!


                      Brutal :PWNAGE!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP