The Ring is considering Bradley vs Alexander for the Ring title

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Check
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 16585
    • 677
    • 132
    • 26,287

    #51
    Originally posted by flat1985
    What?? Jmm is a great fight.
    No it isn't. JMM is a legend and deserves to go out fighting at close to his natural weight. He is a small lightweight and Khan is a large light welter weight. Khan needs to man up and fight the winner of Bradley/Alexander.

    Comment

    • Check
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2008
      • 16585
      • 677
      • 132
      • 26,287

      #52
      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
      Funny considering his resume is better than both these guys.
      So he's allowed to fight a super featherweight instead of fighting the winner of this fight? You are really expecting a lot out of Khan aren't you? Khan better grow a pair and fight the winner. No more tune ups.

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #53
        Originally posted by Check
        So he's allowed to fight a super featherweight instead of fighting the winner of this fight? You are really expecting a lot out of Khan aren't you? Khan better grow a pair and fight the winner. No more tune ups.
        What the *** are you talking about?

        Comment

        • ИATAS
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2007
          • 36648
          • 2,509
          • 1,953
          • 50,835

          #54
          Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
          Khan is talking about fighting in the UK, then fighting the winner.
          He's talking about fighting in the UK next then fighting JMM...

          Why would the #1 and #3 fight for the belt? Makes zero sense. Unless its a situation like the Klitschkos. And everyone knows Alexander is a phony champion already.
          If Khan isn't going to fight winner this year that's why it makes sense. I'm a khan fan and I'm telling you right now no way golden boy matches him up with bardley/alexander in his next two fights. He is their future cashcow right now they aren't going to risk it, especially after almost getting KO'd by Maidana.

          Not everyone scored the fight for Kotelnik, btw. There were a lot of people who scored it for Alexander, ESPN.com for example had it 115-113 for Alexander.

          Comment

          • Check
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2008
            • 16585
            • 677
            • 132
            • 26,287

            #55
            Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
            What the *** are you talking about?
            I'm talking about Khan fighting Marquez instead of the winner of Bradley/Alexander. There's no room for that **** in the sport especially if Bradley wins the fight. If Khan wants to be the best and avoids the number 1 guy to fight a super featherweight he gets nothing from me.

            Comment

            • Dirk Diggler UK
              Deleted
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 48836
              • 1,312
              • 693
              • 58,902

              #56
              Originally posted by ИATAS206
              He's talking about fighting in the UK next then fighting JMM...



              If Khan isn't going to fight winner this year that's why it makes sense. I'm a khan fan and I'm telling you right now no way golden boy matches him up with bardley/alexander in his next two fights. He is their future cashcow right now they aren't going to risk it, especially after almost getting KO'd by Maidana.

              Not everyone scored the fight for Kotelnik, btw. There were a lot of people who scored it for Alexander, ESPN.com for example had it 115-113 for Alexander.
              Every interview Ive seen Khan give, hes said he's taking a fight in England and then fighting the winner.

              It makes no sense to give the Ring Belt out just because you may think Khan isnt gonna fight them this year, thats one of the ******est things ive ever heard. Its not based on anything factual. Everyone said Khan/GBP would continually duck Maidana and ooops what happened?

              Everyone with eyes scored it for Kotelnik.

              Comment

              • Dirk Diggler UK
                Deleted
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 48836
                • 1,312
                • 693
                • 58,902

                #57
                Originally posted by Check
                I'm talking about Khan fighting Marquez instead of the winner of Bradley/Alexander. There's no room for that **** in the sport especially if Bradley wins the fight. If Khan wants to be the best and avoids the number 1 guy to fight a super featherweight he gets nothing from me.
                Thats nice. More hypotheticals. I dont see how this effects the issue. Bradley vs Alexander should not be for the Ring title, full stop. It shouldnt even be for the WBC or IBF titles. Phony fight.

                Comment

                • The Gambler1981
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • May 2008
                  • 25961
                  • 520
                  • 774
                  • 49,039

                  #58
                  I don't see why not.

                  Comment

                  • americanbot
                    Banned
                    • Aug 2010
                    • 4002
                    • 179
                    • 29
                    • 4,267

                    #59
                    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                    Nice to know you have no argument.
                    any ****** that feel as though koltilnik won 8 rounds & devon 4 (when devon came out POCKETING 4 rounds) has no argument & is clearly baised.

                    Comment

                    • Dirk Diggler UK
                      Deleted
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 48836
                      • 1,312
                      • 693
                      • 58,902

                      #60
                      Originally posted by americanbot
                      any ****** that feel as though koltilnik won 8 rounds & devon 4 (when devon came out POCKETING 4 rounds) has no argument & is clearly baised.
                      AT LEAST 8 rounds.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP