Now we all know that comparing Haye vs either of the Klitschkos is laughable by any measure, unless of course you are from Cypress or East London, but what about Adamek and Haye? Who has the better resume and career accomplishments as of now?
Multi-Division Champs
Both Haye and Adamek have won belts into separate divisions. Adamek was a LHW champ and CW champ. Haye was a CW champ and "won" the HW WBA title. However Haye's champion status at HW is tainted by the fact that the only reason why he even holds the WBA belt was because the corrupt sanctioning body stripped the legitimate WBA champ of it and simply gave the belt back to Valuev without a fight. The true WBA champ was Chagaev who lost to Wladimir while he was still the WBA champ, so in effect, it is Wlad that hold the WBA belt.
Another factor is the way they won those belts. Even if you think that Valuev was the WBA title holder at the time Haye "beat" him, Haye ran for 12 rounds and barely threw 5 punches a round, hardly a decisive victory. Whereas Adamek got his belts in a decisive and without controversy.
Edge: Adamek
Number of Defenses
Adamek defended his LHW WBC title twice and his CW IBF title twice. Haye defended his CW titles once and his HW WBA title twice. That is 4 for Adamek and 3 for Haye.
Edge: Adamek
Wins - Quality of Competition
Adamek's competition is still very much relevant in their respective divisions whereas Haye's competition is retired or is on the fringe of relevance. Cunningham is still holds a belt and Chad Dawson just fought for a title against Pascal and lost but that was his only loss of his career, not bad. Haye's competition at CW and HW has been pretty much old men on the verge of retirement. The average age of Haye's HW opponents is 37 years old and at least 8 years older than him, whereas Adamek's competition has generally been younger or the same age as him. Ruiz is retired, Valuev is retired, Barrett is on the verge of retirement, so is Audley most likely.
Edge: Adamek
Losses - Manner of Losses and Quality of Opponent
Both have only one loss but Adamek's lone loss was a decision to a 26 year old unbeaten top fighter in Chad Dawson, who is still very much relevant in his division with one recent loss to Pascal. Haye on the other hand lost to a 40 year old who had 6 losses, 5 by KO, via a TKO, in a fight where he had to be hooked up to an oxygen tank afterwards.
Edge: Adamek
Clear winner - Adamek.
Multi-Division Champs
Both Haye and Adamek have won belts into separate divisions. Adamek was a LHW champ and CW champ. Haye was a CW champ and "won" the HW WBA title. However Haye's champion status at HW is tainted by the fact that the only reason why he even holds the WBA belt was because the corrupt sanctioning body stripped the legitimate WBA champ of it and simply gave the belt back to Valuev without a fight. The true WBA champ was Chagaev who lost to Wladimir while he was still the WBA champ, so in effect, it is Wlad that hold the WBA belt.
Another factor is the way they won those belts. Even if you think that Valuev was the WBA title holder at the time Haye "beat" him, Haye ran for 12 rounds and barely threw 5 punches a round, hardly a decisive victory. Whereas Adamek got his belts in a decisive and without controversy.
Edge: Adamek
Number of Defenses
Adamek defended his LHW WBC title twice and his CW IBF title twice. Haye defended his CW titles once and his HW WBA title twice. That is 4 for Adamek and 3 for Haye.
Edge: Adamek
Wins - Quality of Competition
Adamek's competition is still very much relevant in their respective divisions whereas Haye's competition is retired or is on the fringe of relevance. Cunningham is still holds a belt and Chad Dawson just fought for a title against Pascal and lost but that was his only loss of his career, not bad. Haye's competition at CW and HW has been pretty much old men on the verge of retirement. The average age of Haye's HW opponents is 37 years old and at least 8 years older than him, whereas Adamek's competition has generally been younger or the same age as him. Ruiz is retired, Valuev is retired, Barrett is on the verge of retirement, so is Audley most likely.
Edge: Adamek
Losses - Manner of Losses and Quality of Opponent
Both have only one loss but Adamek's lone loss was a decision to a 26 year old unbeaten top fighter in Chad Dawson, who is still very much relevant in his division with one recent loss to Pascal. Haye on the other hand lost to a 40 year old who had 6 losses, 5 by KO, via a TKO, in a fight where he had to be hooked up to an oxygen tank afterwards.
Edge: Adamek
Clear winner - Adamek.
Comment