Resume, career, accomplishments: Adamek vs Haye, you decide...
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Just did and that wasn't without any long thought, I am sure if I started to look at BoxRec I could pull up a bunch more names based on accomplishments. I really don't watch the CW much, most if it because the fights are not shown here in the US since most of them are European.
Haye has a case for top 10 CW. De Leon IMO is a top 5.
Holyfield the GOAT in the division.
But, Haye has a case for top 10 all time. To say he doesn't is just being a bias hater.
But, again granted to be fair being top 10 in that division is not say much. Since that division history is pretty weak.Comment
-
Throw him in there as well, now that I think about it, I am not sure Gayevid even makes top 20 of top CWs of all time. Toney's win over Jirov is greater than anything Gayevid accomplished at CW.Comment
-
That is all that is need to be said.
No point in talking boxing with idiots.Comment
-
Comment
-
Petty is somebody begging for attention on a internet forum like you do.
And, that is the only conclusion I could come up with when somebody says Haye is not a top 20 CW. And, in the whole thread has done nothing but say bias hate towards said fighter.Comment
-
Riighttt...I am the idiot for thinking that a CW who had ONE defense his whole career at CW and only TWO title fights is not top 20. It's not like he beat anyone good, a shot Mormeck and crap Enzo does not make a legacy, no matter how you spin it.Comment
-
Comment
-
Anyone who voted for Haye in this poll MUST be British. Adamek CLEARLY has the better resume, with better wins, and he's taken MUCH tougher fights. Haye has fought NOBODY the likes of Dawson and Cunningham throughout his entire career. I'm GLAD Adamek is getting the shot at Wlad before Haye. He deserves it. Haye doesn't.Comment
Comment