Yanks Are Supposed To Beat Mexicans

[americanbot]

Mexico dominates lightweigh and super flyweight and also light flyweight where segura had but was striped of the wba belt and has the wbo belt. Keb bass has the wbc and solis should of won the ibf from lazarte but in the rematch he will get it. And has tittle holders in most other division in the lower weights. No nation can have all the tittles or win every fight but mexico comes the closest at the lower weights.

mexico dominates 2 divisons in the lower weights. (TWO) mexico doesn't dominate light flyweight....they have segura at the weight but apart from that they have nothing. thats not dominating a weightclass because segura could get knocked off tomorrow. now they DO INDEED dominate lightweight and superflyweight. no doubt about it.

but the lower divisions consist of 11 divisions in ALL......HOW THE HELL IS DOMINATING 2 divisions a case for dominating the lower weight divisions???? this is the POINT that I'm trying to DRILL in your head. mexicans do NOT dominate the lower weight divisions. not even CLOSE.

[BOLLOCKS]

You are so fkn ******.

Most boxers I know pay for their training. They have boxing gyms in Mexico dont they.

Most trainers get their young amateur fighters amateur fights and pay fees. and yes it is a program , but what does the money they pay to train have anything to do.

They gotta buy their ****. They gotta train , they got to fight just like everyone else. Is not anybody fault that Mexico's ATG's havent havent given back to their communities. Or have they?

So many double standards.

That is a ridiculous statement. Look at Cubas "poor" amateur program. They have great amateur fighters. And improvise on equipment. And fight each other for like 1,000 fights. And some of those promising stars struggle in the pros.

What do Cubans got to do with this? All they have in Cuba is amateurs so their amateurs are better than any in latin america because of it, and Gamboa was king in the amateurs and is now better than any Mexican and Rican at 126 in the pros.

[theplayerpimp]

mexico dominates 2 divisons in the lower weights. (TWO) mexico doesn't dominate light flyweight....they have segura at the weight but apart from that they have nothing. thats not dominating a weightclass because segura could get knocked off tomorrow. now they DO INDEED dominate lightweight and superflyweight. no doubt about it.

but the lower divisions consist of 11 divisions in ALL......HOW THE HELL IS DOMINATING 2 divisions a case for dominating the lower weight divisions???? this is the POINT that I'm trying to DRILL in your head. mexicans do NOT dominate the lower weight divisions. not even CLOSE.

At light flyweight segura had two of the mayor belts but was striped for no reason the wbc belt is heald by another mexican. And the ibf should be in solis hands if you know anyhting bout boxing. But he will get it in a the rematch. So if wasnt for boxing policies mexicans would have all the tittles at light flyweight. And let me ask you how many does the us control or any other nation for that matter?
Well ok mayb dominate is an over statement but they have way more champs than any other nation and its not even close

[americanbot]

At light flyweight segura had two of the mayor belts but was striped for no reason the wbc belt is heald by another mexican. And the ibf should be in solis hands if you know anyhting bout boxing. But he will get it in a the rematch. So if wasnt for boxing policies mexicans would have all the tittles at light flyweight. And let me ask you how many does the us control or any other nation for that matter?
Well ok mayb dominate is an over statement but they have way more champs than any other nation and its not even close

I've broken everything down to you and you're running in circles. at this point you're trolling...titles means nothing in this modern era. any & everyone has 1.

GOOD DAY SIR.

[Kagami Taiga]

kinda hard to compare americans and mexicans. mexico is a poorer country whose nutrition isnt as top notched as america not to mention the fact that mexicans are on average relatively small. therefore americans are able to compete at higer weight classes than mexicans.

with that said, when a great american fighter fights a great mexican fighter, who wins??? then u have your answer.

[gibo]

What do Cubans got to do with this? All they have in Cuba is amateurs so their amateurs are better than any in latin america because of it, and Gamboa was king in the amateurs and is now better than any Mexican and Rican at 126 in the pros.

That has yet to be proven!!! Better than anybody at 126???? LMAO!!!!

[theplayerpimp]

kinda hard to compare americans and mexicans. mexico is a poorer country whose nutrition isnt as top notched as america not to mention the fact that mexicans are on average relatively small. therefore americans are able to compete at higer weight classes than mexicans.

with that said, when a great american fighter fights a great mexican fighter, who wins??? then u have your answer.

That rarely happens there was a thread a few days ago. But it has to do with the natural size of nationalites bc most mexicans tend to be smaller while
Americans tend to be bigger.

[americanbot]

kinda hard to compare americans and mexicans. mexico is a poorer country whose nutrition isnt as top notched as america not to mention the fact that mexicans are on average relatively small. therefore americans are able to compete at higer weight classes than mexicans.

with that said, when a great american fighter fights a great mexican fighter, who wins??? then u have your answer.

boxing is for the poor man. if it was about population & money china would be a super power in boxing. even a small island like puerto rico defeats places like china & india. theres just a lot of talent & a lot of intrest for boxing in a small place like puerto rico. & thats what it comes down to. it doesn't come down to any of that other stuff.

boxing has always been for the poor man. most american fighters came from poor backgrounds........it has always seemed like the more poor....the better the fighter.....look at pacman.....in my opinion america just have a very rich history when it comes to boxing. period point blank.......

[Mr. Philadel]

Schools in Mexico? No such thing.

[Kagami Taiga]

boxing is for the poor man. if it was about population & money china would be a super power in boxing. even a small island like puerto rico defeats places like china & india. theres just a lot of talent & a lot of intrest for boxing in a small place like puerto rico. & thats what it comes down to. it doesn't come down to any of that other stuff.

boxing has always been for the poor man. most american fighters came from poor backgrounds........it has always seemed like the more poor....the better the fighter.....look at pacman.....in my opinion america just have a very rich history when it comes to boxing. period point blank.......

no i get that. and i agree the poorer the boxer, the more hungrier. what i am saying tho is that american standards of nutrition are higher than those found in mexico. its just a fact that leads to amercians, even mexican americans, developing bigger bodies than their mexican counterparts. even poor americans have access to food and nutrition that most mexicans dont. that doesnt make us better fighters tho. just bigger.