does calzaghe get more credit for schooling hopkins now?

[prinzemanspopa]

9 rounds get the fook outta here. There were plenty of swing rounds that could have went either way after the 2 knockdown rounds that would pull the entire fight into a draw fight on anybody except for a hopkins ballicker's scorecard. Even Tarver said in his immediate interview after the fight that it would be easy to give Hopkins sentiment rounds because of how old of a fart he is.

If you're going to quote me in future,I suggest you do so correctly and directly.I'm sure even yourself isn't capable of doing that.



You're too ****** to know what an actual swing round is.The general consensus is that Hopkins did dominate the second half of the fight.Pascal did nothing but run and throw f^ck all in return.This might qualify as a "swing round" to three corrupt judges and an idiot like yourself,but most know better.


at "even tarver" - as if Tarver is supposed to be objective as possible when discussing Hopkins.

[daggum]

we go to the judges scorecards and the winner by split decision is:

JOOOOOOOOOOE CALZAAAGEEEEEEEE

compliments of michael buffer

no i said based on scoring criteria not based on corruption and incompetence.

[djtmal]

[QUOTE=prinzemanspopa;9921040]If you're going to quote me in future,I suggest you do so correctly and directly.I'm sure even yourself isn't capable of doing that. You're too ****** to know what an actual swing round is.The general consensus is that Hopkins did dominate the second half of the fight.Pascal did nothing but run and throw f^ck all in return.This might qualify as a "swing round" to three corrupt judges and an idiot like yourself,but most know better.
at "even tarver" - as if Tarver is supposed to be objective as possible when discussing Hopkins.

first off, save those idle threats for somebody who is scared...

second off, i don't mind arguing with delusional hopkins fans who have to resort to calling people ****** and idiots, just as long as you admit that you are a pathetic ballicker who's butthurt that hopkins only managed a draw in a fight where he obviously needed a ko to win...

hopkins fans are just like him...a bunch of whining crying b**ch asses....

[Dirk Diggler UK]

i give him full credit for losing. if you are generous you can give 1 out of the first 6 rounds to calzaghe. go ahead try to say otherwise and i will post detailed video evidence on how hopkins out landed calzaghe by a wide margin while landing the much harder punches. fight was a clear robbery.

even though he did come on late he was clearly outboxed for most of the fight. all the ignorant people have is flawed compubox which has been proven wrong and silly platitudes about workrate and faking low blows. you got anything which proves calzaghe won based on the actual scoring criteria? nope!

When I watched it live, I think I gave Hopkins 4 out of the first 6. But then he lost 5 out of the last 6.

[djtmal]

no i said based on scoring criteria not based on corruption and incompetence.

scoring criteria? lol...he was reading from the judges scorecards, which meant they favored what calzaghe was doing over nard, which calzaghe was actually outlanding nard all fight...and please save all your pro-hopkins clips...

oh i forget any time hopkins loses, its because of corrupt judges, hbo, the man, or the canadian mounties...

[daggum]

scoring criteria? lol...he was reading from the judges scorecards, which meant they favored what calzaghe was doing over nard, which calzaghe was actually outlanding nard all fight...and please save all your pro-hopkins clips...

oh i forget any time hopkins loses, its because of corrupt judges, hbo, the man, or the canadian mounties...

that can be proven false. you don't want to know the truth cause that would effect your troll agenda. keep on fighting the good fight for all the ignorant people around the world!

[daggum]

When I watched it live, I think I gave Hopkins 4 out of the first 6. But then he lost 5 out of the last 6.

well now you can go watch it again and see where you went wrong. i don't blame people for messing up and thinking calzaghe won watching it live. hell the judges did so why not a normal fan?

now that we can re watch it and see hopkins clearly win at least 6 rounds there is no possible way to have calzaghe winning. just a bad decision where he fooled the judges. that doesn't mean we have to be fooled.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

well now you can go watch it again and see where you went wrong. i don't blame people for messing up and thinking calzaghe won watching it live. hell the judges did so why not a normal fan?

now that we can re watch it and see hopkins clearly win at least 6 rounds there is no possible way to have calzaghe winning. just a bad decision where he fooled the judges. that doesn't mean we have to be fooled.

Ive watched it several times and tbh, I scored it even wider for Calzaghe if anything.

[djtmal]

that can be proven false. you don't want to know the truth cause that would effect your troll agenda. keep on fighting the good fight for all the ignorant people around the world!

lol...i go by what i see, and i saw hopkins lose....read it and weep

[daggum]

Ive watched it several times and tbh, I scored it even wider for Calzaghe if anything.

but you score fights based on emotion. who's coming forward(into punches) and who's throwing more(and missing) are your criteria. i use the actual rules and that's probably why i have hopkins winning easily.