Biggest tragic loss/waste of talent in boxing, Salvador Sanchez or Edwin Valero???!!!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DARKSEID
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2010
    • 17578
    • 962
    • 512
    • 43,940

    #21
    Originally posted by figzuki
    ..... don't need ur type of response bro..
    Honestly though, I've watched some of his fights and sanchez outclasses him by a mile.

    Valero is a little overrated

    Comment

    • War Dinamita
      Canelo Mafia
      • May 2009
      • 6188
      • 342
      • 129
      • 14,690

      #22
      ****** ass thread to compare an ATG to a overrated hyped Top Rank fighter.

      Sanchez is an ATG and accomplished more at the young age of 23 than most fighters will accomplish in their entire career.

      Valero was never going to be anything special.

      Comment

      • figzuki
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2010
        • 2187
        • 73
        • 83
        • 8,413

        #23
        Originally posted by Rbgnwo
        Honestly though, I've watched some of his fights and sanchez outclasses him by a mile.

        Valero is a little overrated
        Dude he was on the come up, people say he didn't fight anybody but I mean he was still coming up!! Ya'll gotta look at the guy for overall career potential like I said.

        Sanchez was well established already with 40+ fights at the age of 23 and great champion!!

        Comment

        • figzuki
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2010
          • 2187
          • 73
          • 83
          • 8,413

          #24
          Originally posted by Libra_Por_Libra
          ****** ass thread to compare an ATG to a overrated hyped Top Rank fighter.

          Sanchez is an ATG and accomplished more at the young age of 23 than most fighters will accomplish in their entire career.

          Valero was never going to be anything special.

          Why not? Maybe u think that cuz of his lifestyle or something?

          Comment

          • TBear
            Lords of Boxingscene
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2008
            • 113272
            • 6,077
            • 12,778
            • 1,665,677,098

            #25
            Sanchez was young tested against great fighters and a proven commodity who was on top of the world. Valero was untested and at the bottom. Unworthy compairison.

            Comment

            • zero188
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Mar 2010
              • 837
              • 17
              • 1
              • 7,074

              #26
              Sanchez is an ATG, valero is not/will never be. No matter how good his record/power might have looked, we will never know how good HE COULD HAVE BEEN. I wouldn't consider Sanchez a waste of talent. valero was a waste of human life.

              Comment

              • figzuki
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2010
                • 2187
                • 73
                • 83
                • 8,413

                #27
                Originally posted by zero188
                Sanchez is an ATG, valero is not/will never be. No matter how good his record/power might have looked, we will never know how good HE COULD HAVE BEEN. I wouldn't consider Sanchez a waste of talent. valero was a waste of human life.
                That's why I named the thread loss/waste, Sanchez was a loss and Valero was a waste!

                Just wanted to know what people might have thought about Valeros career if he wasn't such a head case!!

                Comment

                • figzuki
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 2187
                  • 73
                  • 83
                  • 8,413

                  #28
                  Originally posted by TBear
                  Sanchez was young tested against great fighters and a proven commodity who was on top of the world. Valero was untested and at the bottom. Unworthy compairison.
                  Wasn't really comparing the two bro, all i wanted to know was what people though on these Boxing losses and maybe what Valero's career could've been like in peoples eyes, that's all man!!

                  Comment

                  • The Gambler1981
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 25961
                    • 520
                    • 774
                    • 49,039

                    #29
                    Those two should not ever be mentioned in the same breath or even belong in the same line of thought.

                    In multiple ways.

                    Comment

                    • figzuki
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 2187
                      • 73
                      • 83
                      • 8,413

                      #30
                      Originally posted by The Gambler1981
                      Those two should not ever be mentioned in the same breath or even belong in the same line of thought.

                      In multiple ways.
                      This is just about what their careers could've been bro, not to say one is better than the other!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP