the more opponents says they have already figured out manny pacquiao the more possible that theyll be disfigured after their fight.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Honestly, Pac has a very one dimensional stlyle. Easy to predict.
Collapse
-
Manny is a bad bad man. He makes plenty of adjustments when needed. Changes angles constantly, with the fist and the feet. What he doesn't do is fight anyone who can counter. Not going too happen unless he has major advantages. Whether he won or not, the last counter puncher manny faced gave him hell.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by horge View PostCan't really be called a duck if Pac ruled out any more MW's
for his next fight, BEFORE Sergio made a challenge. If you
want to keep misrepresenting the chronology, then troll on.
LOL... just laying out TR's way of thinking.
Your counter is flawed, however. It isn't about years-ago
drawing power, but most recent data. Just how much did
Marquez-Katsidis bank, again?
In any case, I actually disagree with how TR views JMM's ability
to generate revenue wrt cinco de mayo weekend, which is when
he'd have been fighting Manny.
Extra factors aplenty against Pac-JMM 3:
Arum hates Schaefer, and Pacquiao's not eager to reward
JMM's insults with a payday.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stigma View PostVery true story.
I don't like when people say Mayweather will destroy Pacquiao because of what Marquez did to him. For this reason alone: Marquez is a counter-puncher by nature, but he can and will take a shot if he has to. He'd prefer not to, though, and would rather his technique carry the day. He ate a lot of Pacquiao's shots and he countered in the midst of that. Kudos. But it wasn't enough to win.
Erik Morales. This guy was practically a masochist in the ring. He ate shots from everybody he fought, and it looked like he enjoyed it. And honestly, as bizarre as it may sound (and it could very well be the scotch talking), I think that's what you have to do to beat Pacquiao. You have to be willing to eat his best combinations and maintain your composure enough to fire one back when his is over. A better one. Not many people can do that. I think Morales was the perfect combination of balls, chin, and technique. And it worked.
Mayweather isn't your traditional Mexican fighter. He doesn't want to get hit. If he just absolutely stonewalled Pacquiao with technique, I would be pretty surprised, but would praise the win significantly. But if Pacquiao shows he's going to make it a tough night, I'd say he's already won.
It is clear that some people think Floyd will do what JMM did, or worst, just based on counter punching alone. When all they do is prove they have no idea on why JMM has success against Pac.
Anyway, good post.
Comment
-
If Pac is one dimensional, then all other boxers are bums with no business even stepping in the ring to fight. All other boxers must be couch potatoes who should stick to driving cabs they are so non-dimensional and easy to figure out.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BattleHardened View PostWhat makes him so good is his natural athletic ability, heart, and toughness. Against Mayweather though, I don't see it being much of a fight after the first 3-4 rounds. Too bad Mayweather is a gigantic vagina with loose brown lips.
May may tend to w0rk loose br0wn lipps, but he's defo no puzz. Steppin into tha ring with Mosley is hell of a challenge. We'll see if Pac really gots dat heart n toughness you're shpeakin of when he faces tha Shoog.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BattleHardened View PostWhat makes him so good is his natural athletic ability, heart, and toughness. Against Mayweather though, I don't see it being much of a fight after the first 3-4 rounds. Too bad Mayweather is a gigantic vagina with loose brown lips.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Blue Heffner View PostSMH.........
Originally posted by Phil Ivey View PostMartinez paper champ? You have no clue do you?
FWIW I already asked what that "one dimension" is but notice how no one has answered that question......showing that they are nothing but trolls.
Comment
Comment