Honestly, Pac has a very one dimensional stlyle. Easy to predict.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rickety Cricket
    Undisputed Champion
    • May 2009
    • 1268
    • 75
    • 89
    • 7,708

    #101
    Originally posted by BattleHardened
    What makes him so good is his natural athletic ability, heart, and toughness. Against Mayweather though, I don't see it being much of a fight after the first 3-4 rounds. Too bad Mayweather is a gigantic vagina with loose brown lips.
    If it would be so easy for Floyd to beat Pac he would have fought him already.

    Comment

    • Imatroll
      I AM NOT A TROLL
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2010
      • 2690
      • 170
      • 19
      • 12,399

      #102
      Originally posted by boxer#1
      If it would be so easy for Floyd to beat Pac he would have fought him already.
      ^^^^^^^^^this

      Comment

      • rambov
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2007
        • 3598
        • 102
        • 49
        • 12,413

        #103
        Originally posted by M@nny
        but evidently impossible to defeat
        Who is impossible to beat?

        Comment

        • lyrical
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Oct 2007
          • 811
          • 24
          • 0
          • 7,269

          #104
          Easy to predict, difficult to do anything about.

          Quit Hating, Pacman is awesome and similarly Floyd is awesome too, I wish people would quit trying to deny these guys talents.

          Comment

          • serv
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Sep 2009
            • 13314
            • 1,555
            • 2,007
            • 20,812

            #105
            Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
            i don't get this stigma of being "one dimensional"

            nor do i get how people define being "one dimensional"


            a fighter's job is to win the fight. if doing the same thing and fighting the same way in most of his fights gets the job done , then good for him.

            it means you're very good if you don't have to change how you fight in fights.

            of course there's those who can't fight any other way and aren't very good but some very good fighters were "one dimensional"

            they didn't need to change it up much because what they did worked.

            generally people change their fighting style to compensate for a weakness.

            generally people change it up midway through a fight because what they are doing doesn't work.


            i also feel that people think of a simple brawler or slugger as "one dimensional"

            yet they don't consider guys who are just defensive boxers as one dimenstional.

            if the only way a fighter can fight is to box and be on the defensive. i consider him one dimensional too. even if he is skilled and/or fast.
            right on... if it ain't broke, dont fix it.

            Comment

            • Dale Cardon
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Nov 2010
              • 3149
              • 1,661
              • 2,054
              • 11,003

              #106
              Some poster keep on saying predictable so I am posting this again here... pls read

              Originally posted by Dale Cardon
              I laugh when I see post like this...

              How can you easily predict unorthodox akward fighters???
              Are you aware with what most of his fallen opponents say after the fight?
              They say they can't see where the punches are coming from...does that tell you something?

              They can't see because they can't predict.

              Now please, it is new year and let us all try to contribute something productive to this sport that we all love. Let us post comments to our hearts' content, but please let us all make sure we know what we are talking about.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP