Who would have won Prime Prince Naseem Vs The Barrera That Beat Him

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PrinceNaz88
    THE PRINCE IS FO' REAL
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2010
    • 3335
    • 94
    • 93
    • 10,820

    #41
    Originally posted by Chaconlittlered
    Its pretty sad that some people are suggesting that Hamed did not train hard
    even though this is what Hamed wanted I remember he said that first Barrera than Morales this homie looked like an ameuter in there or maybe he was trying to clown around and Barrera made him look pretty ****** in there what ever the reason Barrera won no doubt plus Barrera had 3 loses Junior Jones x2and Morales coming in to this fight and your excuses are that his didnt train hard enough that pretty lame that was Prime Hamed accepted or not but that was and Barrera well he had to change from a puncher to boxer becuase of the loses to Jones and Morales Hamed had no huevos to come back
    he took the bit-ch way out and retired if he was sooo good he could of rebounded like Barrera Morales Marquez hell like everyone has done oh and Barrera and Hamed are the same age they were born in 1974 and Barrera started in 1989 and Hamed in 1992 Prime vs Prime Barrera wins and Stewart is one of the best trainers so let it go bro
    And...... breathe.

    Comment

    • SOPH~ REP.
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2009
      • 1718
      • 34
      • 6
      • 9,827

      #42
      Barrera was more past his Prime than Prince ,it would be the same result,Remember Barrera was the 1st big step in opposition for Prince (only 1 hof) and kevin kelly

      Comment

      • Albo Dakkid
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Jan 2010
        • 358
        • 13
        • 30
        • 6,425

        #43
        Barrera beats him at anytime and anyplace. Naz was good but not the same in the same caliber as barrera/morrales. These guys would beat him with experience all night long

        Comment

        • MXboxingfan
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Sep 2010
          • 1053
          • 36
          • 20
          • 7,194

          #44
          Originally posted by qari
          we come here 2 talk boxing why be racist?

          when prince was in his early twentys he had head movement n body movement he didnt move his head in the barrera fight

          frank warren offered barrera the fight b4 buh barreras manager guided him away and waited for naseem to decline

          dnt deny u knw u luv the prince
          Both were around 27 at the time. Hamed was also undefeated at the time.

          I would say that you are racist. You discredit Barrera's win over Hamed because he is Mexican. If Barrera was a British ******. You would not have a problem with his victory over Hamed.

          Originally posted by qari
          augie sanchez wud hav koed morales n barrera u seen the size on him?

          kelley was 47-1 when naz koed him den morales n barrera beat him afta cuz he was leftovers
          Augie Sanchez was just a journeyman. You gave Hamed too much credit for that win.

          Hamed was not an elite boxer. That is why he lost. End of story.
          Last edited by MXboxingfan; 12-31-2010, 08:54 PM.

          Comment

          • RIZO24
            El Punisher
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2010
            • 3625
            • 265
            • 235
            • 11,524

            #45
            This is a joke!! Barrera beats Hamed all the time!!

            Comment

            • qari
              Contender
              • May 2010
              • 449
              • 32
              • 127
              • 6,841

              #46
              Both were around 27 at the time. Hamed was also undefeated at the time.

              I would say that you are racist. You discredit Barrera's win over Hamed because he is Mexican. If Barrera was a British ******. You would not have a problem with his victory over Hamed.
              Dude how can i be racist when i rank erik morales as 1 of the best ever? i scored the fights and had him beat barrera all 3 times imo the knockdown didnt count cuz it wasnt a punch

              Prince naseem had some raw power comeon u cant deny if they were havin a slugfest naz would win each time and when he was with ingle he could actually box but when he left him he jusr relied on power cause he thought he was invincible but no1 is not even mayweather and btw augie beat floyd in the amateurs so you cant say hes a bum

              barrera outboxed prince and made him look silly i agree but if they fought when prince was with ingle naz wins by late ko/tko

              Look at the size differrence between augie and prince comeon he looked like a super lightweiight vs featherweight

              Comment

              • The Surgeon
                Days Of Glory
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Oct 2006
                • 15385
                • 712
                • 1,578
                • 24,784

                #47
                Naz wasnt at his best when he fought MAB but he was still damn good, Marco gave him such a comprehensive beating tho that it wouldnt have made a difference!

                Comment

                • studentofthegam
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2009
                  • 4127
                  • 114
                  • 107
                  • 4,433

                  #48
                  Hamed was not shot out so stop making excuses. His hype was as big as it ever was. He was still undefeated. With that yur point cant even be argued. Barrera just exposed the greatest hype job of my generation. Who the hell did he beat? Oh yeah Kevin Kelley. WTF kinda boxing are yall watching. If Hamed was a great fighter then damn it so is Butter Bean.lol

                  Comment

                  • bruzza
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 259
                    • 9
                    • 4
                    • 6,329

                    #49
                    And that was barreras fault he didn't tra

                    Comment

                    • Rosseboi
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 1240
                      • 103
                      • 19
                      • 7,445

                      #50
                      Originally posted by qari
                      Dude how can i be racist when i rank erik morales as 1 of the best ever?
                      You're clearly holding a bias towards naseem most probably due to Ethnicity or religeon.

                      Point in fact you make a thread asking who would win prime vs prime then every one who replies you try to argue the point with conjecture and unproven facts. That's fanboy talk my friend which leads me to think you've got a bias.

                      Prime or not Barrera was Naseem's frst truly world class opponent truly one of the best of his era and Naseem has no answer for anything. Naseem's style was always going to fail vs Barrera who'd rush in and work the body rather than try for the head like the majority of Naseem's opponents did.

                      Barrera bullied him and Nas could not take it it is that simple.
                      Last edited by Rosseboi; 01-01-2011, 08:42 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP