Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Jean Pascal Talks Hopkins Draw, Rematch, Dawson

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by amayseng View Post
    hopkins won that fight as well

    seriously go watch on youtube called the deception of joe calzaghe vs bernard hopkins

    its a phenomenal production where all the footage of each round is shown

    yet broken down


    everyone should watch it
    Why don't you watch the youtube video that counts how many times Hop clinched or attempted to clinch Joe. Then while you're at it, watch Hop fake injury twice, trying get points deducted. He lost a split at home, if a draw away is like a win, as all the Hop fans are claiming after the Pascal fight, then what do you call a loss at home?

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by lutenco View Post
      The performances of BHOP vs PAVLIK and PASCAL showed how good was CALZAGHE in the ring!!!
      styles makes fights. calzaghe was a VERY busy slapping boxer. his conditioning was top notch too. so it was no surprise joe out-hussled his opponents to get the decision.

      pavlik & pascal are punchers, b-hop takes them to school anyday.

      i predicted a b-hop schooling of pascal... i was disappointed with decision, but it was close. i was REALLY surprised with b-hop getting dropped twice though.

      i think a motivated dawson would put it on pascal in the rematch... im not a fan of dawson either.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by chaos View Post
        Why don't you watch the youtube video that counts how many times Hop clinched or attempted to clinch Joe. Then while you're at it, watch Hop fake injury twice, trying get points deducted. He lost a split at home, if a draw away is like a win, as all the Hop fans are claiming after the Pascal fight, then what do you call a loss at home?
        post read, understood and taken

        however irrelevant

        i myself always thought joe won that fight when i watched it live

        go watch that video i spoke about and see for yourself

        seriously

        Comment


        • #14
          No Jean, close rounds go to the fighter who wins the round, by an inch or a mile. By your accounts then you lost to Froch 120-108

          Comment


          • #15
            only reason he beat chad was because dawson didnt take it 2 pascal. only reason!!! and he ****ing lost 2 hopkins. idc wtf he says. he knows it, his trainer knows, all of canada knows it. shut the hell up pascal. fight wasnt close. u won 3 rounds tops. and the rounds u knocked hopkins down in, u could have lost aswell.

            Comment


            • #16
              Pascal did lose to Froch fool

              Comment


              • #17
                This guy is really telling himself lies.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by street bully View Post
                  This guy is really telling himself lies.
                  symptoms of a man who's lost his soul!!...poor Pascal!!

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Pascal..... Stop lying to yourself. All you had going for you was those 2 knockdowns. Even in those rounds when you got the knockdowns, it looked like you were about to lose the round. If you have a a rematch with Dawson, I hope he stops you!

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by super villa1n View Post
                      Pascal did lose to Froch fool
                      Seriously bud, did ya even read the article, it's a reference to him saying the champion gets close round in which his fight with Carl had 12. I understand how people talk without thinking but how do you type without thinking.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP