Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Greatest but most overhyped (top 5)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by gauze View Post
    jirov too. i consider it a big fight anyway
    Screw jirov. Ended baby joe's career. Though joe won that fight.

    That top 5 blows.......You aren't overhyped because you lose fights with age or diminishing skills.

    Comment


    • #32
      Look at these idiots arguing bringing up nobodies,

      Jirov - no one

      Griffin - no one

      and NO i dont hate black fighters I root for pascal and bradley you jackass's haha

      Comment


      • #33
        Lou DelValle, Mike McCallum, Virgil Hill, Reggie Johnson, etc.......those guys were all champs when Jones fought them. Cmon now, your going out of your way to discredit these guys and didnt mention DeLaHoya? He was worse than anybody else.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Walterson View Post
          Funny how all those chaps you mention are black.
          Trinidad is not black.

          He's Rican

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Proud 2 B Whyte View Post
            Trinidad is not black.

            He's Rican
            lol, you can be black and be from puerto rico.......

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by yeho5inco View Post
              who go down as greats but really are way to overhyped? List from most to least.


              1.roy jones jr.(fought in a very weak division and went up to hw to fight the weakest of the bunch)

              2.tito trinidad (solid welterweight but not like anyone but old men were left)

              3.floyd mayweather jr. (has managed to avoid every tough fight since 135lb)

              4.james toney (never won a big fight in his life)

              5.mike tyson (when anyones level of skill was above spink's it was basically over)
              roy jones did beat alot of nobodys i can see it

              felix was solid and nothing more i can see it

              floyd is just a very good boxer when it comes to the art of it i concider him amongst the best to ever do it... I cant see it

              james toney beat micheal nunn and he had some other big fights, hes never been kod either (maybe choked out) i cant see it

              mike tyson destroyed alot of average heavyweights his best opponents were spinks and a washed up holmes... But the man was a f ucking beast!

              I think once these guys established themselfs as good exciting fighters the handlers picked their opponents carefully, once money is involved thats where the overhyping comes!

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by NChristo View Post
                Spinks was probably the most skilled boxer Tyson ever fought.

                Nunn and McCallum.
                Nah, Spinks was over hyped. Are you saying that Michael Spinks was more skilful than Lennox Lewis???

                Spinks made his name by narrowly beating an ageing Holmes of 37 and a decent win over Dwight Muhammad Qawi, he was a great amateur but so was Audley Harrison......

                Tyson was probably over hyped to an extent but he was still destroying very good fighters for some time. Its not as if he nicked decisions.
                Last edited by MickyHatton; 12-20-2010, 05:06 PM.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by MickyHatton View Post
                  Nah, Spinks was over hyped. Are you saying that Michael Spinks was more skilful than Lennox Lewis???

                  Spinks made his name by narrowly beating an ageing Holmes of 37 and a decent win over Dwight Muhammad Qawi, he was a great amateur but so was Audley Harrison......

                  Tyson was probably over hyped to an extent but he was still destroying very good fighters for some time. Its not as if he nicked decisions.
                  spionks was considered the best pfp fighter at the top, or at least top 2-3.

                  because of his skills


                  lol at calling jirov a nobody.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Walt Liquor View Post
                    spionks was considered the best pfp fighter at the top, or at least top 2-3.

                    because of his skills


                    lol at calling jirov a nobody.
                    By some but when you dissect his career, he fought some great names but well past their sell by date, Holmes was 37 and Spinks won by a S/D in the rematch, this earned him the Tyson shot. He got KO'd almost first punch and retired so...how was he not over-hyped? Also he fought a lot in the weak light heavy division.

                    Great amateur though 100-0.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Yeho5incO View Post
                      Look at these idiots arguing bringing up nobodies,

                      Jirov - no one

                      Griffin - no one

                      and NO i dont hate black fighters I root for pascal and bradley you jackass's haha
                      You are probably the biggest idiot here. Some fan you are. BTW who is your favorite fighter?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP