Roach to insist drug testing for the Mosley fight

[V.WEBB]

ROach talking outta his ass again. But let's see the imaginary reasons why.

And let me ask this question to all the haters out there who'r getting their panties wet coz they don't know how to read....

Didn't Shane passed the regular NSAC drug testing before swearing under oath that he indeed took PEDS?

So if you are the opposing team, wouldn't the idea cross your mind? Even thought Roach did not say anything about additional testing in that interview?

Yes it is ironic but not to a point hypocritical for team pac SHOULD THEY REQUEST ADDITIONAL TEST, but the fact remains that Shane was the one who was proven to use PEDS, and haters can twist it to their agenda but will just circle jerk around the fact which remains that Pac was never proven to be a user.

I wonder....

Yo Tam, it IS hypocritical for the fact that they themselves stated the NSAC testing is fine and dandy and that THEY would follow the Commission rules regarding drug testing. That was one of their stances as to why they didn't want to do additional testing. So, for them to possibly want another fighter to take additional tests besides that of the NSAC is where the hypocritical part comes in. However, we definitely need more information on what Roach is talking about exactly though.

[V.WEBB]

Yeah when you say current testing is adequate for your fighter and berate another camp for even suggesting stricter procedures then turn around and request stricter procedures yourself against another fighter.....................that by definition is a hypocrite

Yea, I just made this same point.

[Tamis!]

Yeah when you say current testing is adequate for your fighter and berate another camp for even suggesting stricter procedures then turn around and request stricter procedures yourself against another fighter.....................that by definition is a hypocrite

So you're one of 'em who can't read.

Roach didn't say anything regarding additional testing, he's referring to the regular NSAC testing.

[Uturn]

Man, I'm getting sick of Roach calling all the shots.

[Tamis!]

Yea, I just made this same point.

Like I said COACH, if Roach did request additional testing, then we'll have the same afterthought.

Though I know you read...if you get my drift.

[Ray*]

Why would Roach be talking about drug testing? They have a lot of faith in the NSAC test so it shouldn't be a problem now for Roach.

[V.WEBB]

Like I said COACH, if Roach did request additional testing, then we'll have the same afterthought.

Though I know you read...if you get my drift.

Right, I replied to your post. But I said this as well

However, we definitely need more information on what Roach is talking about exactly though.

We don't know what he is talking about, but from the looks of it, it appears hypocritical. We will see how it plays out.

[Tamis!]

Yo Tam, it IS hypocritical for the fact that they themselves stated the NSAC testing is fine and dandy and that THEY would follow the Commission rules regarding drug testing. That was one of their stances as to why they didn't want to do additional testing. So, for them to possibly want another fighter to take additional tests besides that of the NSAC is where the hypocritical part comes in. However, we definitely need more information on what Roach is talking about exactly though.

Fair enough COACH.

Fact is what Roach said is too vague, very open to interpretation. Hence the assumptions.

[V.WEBB]

Why would Roach be talking about drug testing? They have a lot of faith in the NSAC test so it shouldn't be a problem now for Roach.

I couldn't agree with you more Ray, let's see what other information comes out.

[olbanarts]

There is a bit of irony here but the fact is Roach has a basis for asking Mosley for the test being that he admitted to using in the past. Floyd's reasoning was because Pac looked too good not because of any failed tests or actual evidence.

but Roach has had 2 fighters who were on roids. that's just as justifiable as Shane admitting to using but never testing positive.