Isn't this the same freaking argument as the Pac-Marquez fights?

[BoxingTech718]

Yeah right Marquez won that fight also that's why we want to see Pac settle things with the trilogy.

[Chups]

Atleast all of Pacquiao's knockdowns were legitimate.

EXACTLY!!! lolololol

[Tyson.]

Hopkins won 11 out of the 12 rounds.

Pascal landed on average less than 9 punches around. Hopkins was the agressor and was robbed plain and simply. Pascal was running for most of the fight and he didnt clearly win a single round. There were no rounds that could go either way.

Round 1 was Hopkins round. The KD was a shot behind the head so not legit.
Round 3 was a 10-9 round because despite the KD Hopkins was winning the round.

Scores should have been 118-109. If you count the bogus KD in the 1st round then its still 117-110 for Hopkins.

Pacquiao vs JMM was much more closer. Pacs KDs were legit and he was much more competitive than Pascal. That was a close fight so is not the same freaking argument as this was a robbery plain and simply.

[Pugilistic™]

The circumstances are similar but Hopkins was far more dominant against Pascal after the knockdowns than Marquez was against Pacquiao.

Marquez and Pacquiao had alot of close rounds, where after round 3 Hopkins took control of the action and basically won rounds 3 to 12.

[Red_Menace]

Rounds 1 and 3 were too close to call 10-9 rounds, or 9-9 rounds. You have to guys fighting a close round and one guy gets the KD, then it's a 10-8.

[bojangles1987]

The circumstances are similar but Hopkins was far more dominant against Pascal after the knockdowns than Marquez was against Pacquiao.

Marquez and Pacquiao had alot of close rounds, where after round 3 Hopkins took control of the action and basically won rounds 3 to 12.

Just saying, those knockdowns put him down 4 points early. It's very hard to recover from that. If you give Pascal any of the close rounds, you have a draw, and it's not unreasonable to give Pascal those close rounds early, which I did.

I'm just comparing people's reactions, where they are pretending the knockdowns don't count, much like they do when they claim Marquez got robbed. No, the fight was very close on the scorecards, despite Hopkins dominating because he lost 2 crucial points on those knockdowns.

[bestboxingonly]

Not exactly, Pac was robbed on that fight.

[mushahadeen]

Knockdowns count people.

DUH. Those were 10-8 and 10-9 rounds for Pascal. But Hopkins won just about all the other rounds. Only scumbag Canadians claim to not see that.

[Canelo Phresh]

if pascal was pinoy then it would be the same as the as pac-marquez....

but he's canadian so there is isn't much bickering and butthurt about it... it is like b-hop was the marquez in this fight and pascal was the pacqiaoa.

ding ding ding we have a winner.

[Kobayashi]

Not the same, because Marquez didn`t outbox Pac the rest of the fight.

Pac won round 1, 2 and some last rounds. He even broke Marquez`s mouth at the ends of the fight.

6 rounds each and with the 3 knockdowns, Pac clearly beat Marquez.

Judge Bill Clement clearly admit he didn`t score the first rounds right, so Pac is the one who has been rob.

Go rewatch that fight. Pac clearly beat Marquez.