Isn't this the same freaking argument as the Pac-Marquez fights?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bojangles1987
    bo jungle
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 41118
    • 1,326
    • 357
    • 63,028

    #1

    Isn't this the same freaking argument as the Pac-Marquez fights?

    Knockdowns count people. Hopkins did not win enough rounds to make up for the two knockdowns. Yes he dominated the fight, but he dug himself too big an early hole, so this was in no way a robbery.

    There's no way you can score this fight for Pascal, but with the knockdowns he did enough to escape with the draw. Mad respect for Bernard Hopkins, and remind me to NEVER bet against him ever again. Until he proves me wrong, he beats all these light heavyweights.
  • La Zorrita
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2010
    • 1317
    • 131
    • 44
    • 1,701

    #2
    if pascal was pinoy then it would be the same as the as pac-marquez....

    but he's canadian so there is isn't much bickering and butthurt about it... it is like b-hop was the marquez in this fight and pascal was the pacqiaoa.

    Comment

    • Las Vegas,
      BS Celebrity
      • Jul 2010
      • 5363
      • 395
      • 216
      • 12,155

      #3
      To be honest it is the same. Got knocked down in the early rounds, came back and outboxed him and got a draw. Just like in this fight and in the 2nd Marquez fight, I had the counter puncher controlling the fight and winning the fight.

      Comment

      • bojangles1987
        bo jungle
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2009
        • 41118
        • 1,326
        • 357
        • 63,028

        #4
        Originally posted by [KLT] Kirby
        To be honest it is the same. Got knocked down in the early rounds, came back and outboxed him and got a draw. Just like in this fight and in the 2nd Marquez fight, I had the counter puncher controlling the fight and winning the fight.
        I would compare it more to the first Pac-Marquez fight, because Pac had the early three knockdowns and Marquez destroyed him most the fight, just like Pascal looked great the first four rounds or so and then Hopkins dominated down the stretch.

        Comment

        • Rolaz
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 2347
          • 68
          • 0
          • 8,719

          #5
          Both camps agreed on who will be the Judges.

          In the case of Hopkins-Pascal its a clear hometown decision!

          Comment

          • Schmerzen
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 2554
            • 121
            • 146
            • 10,313

            #6
            the first round was a 9-9 round imo, hopkins was winning it until pascal knocked him down.

            Comment

            • TheGreatA
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 14143
              • 633
              • 271
              • 21,863

              #7
              Atleast all of Pacquiao's knockdowns were legitimate.

              Comment

              • Schmerzen
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 2554
                • 121
                • 146
                • 10,313

                #8
                Originally posted by TheGreatA
                Atleast all of Pacquiao's knockdowns were legitimate.
                yeah, hopkins vs pascal fight was more like w. klitschko vs peter 1

                Comment

                • TheGreatA
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 14143
                  • 633
                  • 271
                  • 21,863

                  #9
                  Originally posted by T3dBundy
                  yeah, hopkins vs pascal fight was more like w. klitschko vs peter 1
                  Or Hagler-Roldan, the "knockdown" that is.

                  Comment

                  • ghost deini
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 1700
                    • 70
                    • 5
                    • 8,063

                    #10
                    Originally posted by bojangles1987
                    Knockdowns count people. Hopkins did not win enough rounds to make up for the two knockdowns. Yes he dominated the fight, but he dug himself too big an early hole, so this was in no way a robbery.

                    There's no way you can score this fight for Pascal, but with the knockdowns he did enough to escape with the draw.
                    yeah i know it's not rocket science how many times have we seen a foreign fighter come to the states and get jibbed

                    just because this time it was a yank and on yank television they get all bent outta shape

                    showtime are *****es and jim gray is a joke how unprofessional was he last night in that interview with pascal

                    pascal had every right to tell him to go **** himself

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP