JC did not dominate H-Hop,he won a close fight,so his win over Hopkins cannot look better,it's not like he dominated him,true story!!
So does this make Joe Calzaghe's win over Hopkins look even better?
Collapse
-
it's all in fun no malice really. guy was a good fighter he just didn't beat hopkins and since his entire legacy is billed as the undefeated guy i like to point out that he's not. plus he's a real prick if you've ever listened to his interviews. ego maniac who says he "beat up hopkins" possible brain damage from all that drug use?Comment
-
The video says Hopkins won that exchange. Why?
Why were Calzaghe punches ignored?Comment
-
who would have thought a little bit of lateral movement and a straight right hand was all that it takes to beat the greatest fighter of all time. weird i always thought it would take a bazooka.Comment
-
Hopkins is just so difficult to fight despite him being 46. Joe is the only man that was able to deal with Hopkins tactics, versatile way of fighting. After last night, it's still easy to use Hopkins is still at the top of his A+ Game.
Hopkins is top 10 P4P, he destroyed Pascal last night.Comment
-
In RD 6 at about 1:45 there is an exchange which Calzaghe wins. He starts the exchange by rattling Hopkin's jaw with a right hand and finishes the exchange with a body-shot which forces Hopkins to hold on.
The video says Hopkins won that exchange. Why?
Why were Calzaghe punches ignored?Last edited by daggum; 12-19-2010, 11:33 AM.Comment
-
Hopkins is just so difficult to fight despite him being 46. Joe is the only man that was able to deal with Hopkins tactics, versatile way of fighting. After last night, it's still easy to use Hopkins is still at the top of his A+ Game.
Hopkins is top 10 P4P, he destroyed Pascal last night.Comment
-
Comment
Comment