So does this make Joe Calzaghe's win over Hopkins look even better?

[Sparked_1985]

you don't have to try to do anything. you ask yourself ok who landed punches that round. hopkins landed a bunch while calzaghe didn't. hopkins gets the round. if you ask yourself who had a better windmill impression? well yea calzaghe gets the round then.

score 3-minutes of every round - And it's hard near impossible to give it to Hopkins. If you had two Bernard's in there you wouldn't have a fight.

I'm sorry, but if you spend long periods back-peddling not throwing punches whilst the other guy is hitting fresh air and even looking like crap - whilst occassionally shoeshining and scoring pitty-patty points - the guy hitting fresh air and tip-tapping is winning. A single right-hand clinch combo winning you the round would be a travesty.

[daggum]

its a 14 min video of a 36 minute fight lol hes been trying to convince himself for 2 yrs

there are 6 parts. i didn't think i'd have to post all 6 parts because i thought you would be able to find your way to the other parts. i gave you too much credit i see.

[seany1]

there are 6 parts. i didn't think i'd have to post all 6 parts because i thought you would be able to find your way to the other parts. i gave you too much credit i see.

dude you are only 1 here who keeps ****ing on abt hopkins winning but you just need to look at your profile sig to see how much of a hater you are , every1 knows it even u

[daggum]

score 3-minutes of every round - And it's hard near impossible to give it to Hopkins. If you had two Bernard's in there you wouldn't have a fight.

I'm sorry, but if you spend long periods back-peddling not throwing punches whilst the other guy is hitting fresh air and even looking like **** - whilst occassionally shoeshining and scoring pitty-patty points - the guy hitting fresh air and tip-tapping is winning. A single right-hand clinch combo winning you the round would be a travesty.

it's boxing there is no set way to win a fight. you can go backwards forwards side to side whatever. it's about hitting and not getting hit. hopkins did that much better than calzaghe.

his game plan was to walk calzaghe into punches and he did that clearly. and when calzaghe got close he beat him up on the inside as well. even when it looked like calzaghe had success with his slap furries he was almost never landing. why would the guy not landing punches ever win a boxing match?

some people really pervert the rules so their guy can get the win. clean punching all hopkins. defense all hopkins. effective agression all hopkins. ring generalship debatable i don't see anything here that says calzaghe deserved to win in any way. coming forward=win? so hatton was beating mayweather? same fight. one guy coming forward and getting countered. other guy countering and hardly getting hit.

[seany1]

so why did the boxing experts , critics ,media in u.s not have there own fighter winning . must all be nutthuggers im guessing

[daggum]

dude you are only 1 here who keeps ****ing on abt hopkins winning but you just need to look at your profile sig to see how much of a hater you are , every1 knows it even u

i break fights down in an honest way. what have i been saying that's not true? when i say hopkins clearly outlanded calzaghe with clean hard shots in at least 6 rounds it's because he did. i have video evidence of this that i have provided. i can see hopkins landing many more clean shots from the outside and inside while calzaghe lands barely anything. it's up to you to watch it. i can't make you watch it this isn't clockwork orange

[daggum]

so why did the boxing experts , critics ,media in u.s not have there own fighter winning . must all be nutthuggers im guessing

once again i use facts and you don't. yahoo, espn, and the ap all scored it for hopkins. froch and tyson both said hopkins won it. if you need links i can find them but come on do your own research before making things up out of thin air.

[seany1]

lmfao FROCH nuff said . i use fact aswell dan rafael , ledermann , the commentators of the fight all had calzaghe winning ohh and btw they are AMERICANS

[daggum]

lmfao FROCH nuff said . i use fact aswell dan rafael , ledermann , the commentators of the fight all had calzaghe winning ohh and btw they are AMERICANS

rafael scored it for hopkins. so much for your facts. your facts are about as good as calzaghe's punches. non existant.

http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/boxing/columns/story?columnist=rafael_dan&id=3355228

By Dan Rafael

ESPN.com also had it 114-113 for Hopkins

[Clyde Barrow]

Nothing could make Joe's win over Hopkins look good. Fight was utter shit.