So does this make Joe Calzaghe's win over Hopkins look even better?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • seany1
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Nov 2008
    • 227
    • 10
    • 0
    • 6,281

    #61
    Originally posted by daggum
    opinion based on facts. the facts i use are hopkins clearly outlanding calzaghe in clean hard punches in at least 7 out of 12 rounds. you can't dispute this since i have video evidence of it. now what facts do you base your opinion on?
    official punchstats had calzaghe landing more aswell did you miss that or do you just base who wins a fight on hard punches lmao maybe a cut wins it for you calzaghe had that too

    Comment

    • americanbot
      Banned
      • Aug 2010
      • 4002
      • 179
      • 29
      • 4,267

      #62
      Originally posted by daggum
      why are people who think the guy who lands all the clean punches while making the other guy miss called haters? i "hate" when people are robbed more than anything in boxing but a lot of these posters are just calzaghe fanboys who don't care about integrity as long as their man gets the decision.
      they can care less about integrity or principles or anything like that. its all about nut hugging. when they create thread after thread like this after every hopkins performance they will get burnt each & every time. they did it after the pavlik bout. they are insecure nut huggers with a need for acceptance of their fighter.....

      their not gonna get it because everyone saw a past it hopkins take calzaghe to school.

      everyone saw calzaghe literally scream that he doesn't want a rematch with hopkins...calzaghe doesn't even fight anymore and these clowns STILL CRY about him. how ****ing fruity & pathetic.

      it's getting ridiculous & psycho at this point.

      Comment

      • DonairesRevenge
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Nov 2010
        • 896
        • 97
        • 14
        • 7,274

        #63
        Originally posted by daggum
        opinion based on facts. the facts i use are hopkins clearly outlanding calzaghe in clean hard punches in at least 7 out of 12 rounds. you can't dispute this since i have video evidence of it. now what facts do you base your opinion on?
        You have a bias video that shows a Hopkins highlight montage. I know Calzaghes hands were fast but i didnt know they were so fast that you couldnt see them.

        Lampley: Calzaghes left hand is playing music

        Comment

        • daggum
          All time great
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 43451
          • 4,549
          • 3
          • 166,270

          #64
          Originally posted by British Pride
          You have a bias video that shows a Hopkins highlight montage. I know Calzaghes hands were fast but i didnt know they were so fast that you couldnt see them.

          Lampley: Calzaghes left hand is playing music
          all punches were shown. no bias. it's no highlight montage. it shows all the exchanges in slow mo and who got the better every time? hopkins. calzaghe's fast hands didn't hit the target. why is it biased just because hopkins is the one landing and calzaghe isn't? i would call that reality.
          Last edited by daggum; 12-19-2010, 05:06 AM.

          Comment

          • daggum
            All time great
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 43451
            • 4,549
            • 3
            • 166,270

            #65
            Originally posted by seany1
            official punchstats had calzaghe landing more aswell did you miss that or do you just base who wins a fight on hard punches lmao maybe a cut wins it for you calzaghe had that too
            those compubox numbers have been proven inaccurate that's why i don't ever use compubox to help me decide who wins a fight. hopkins landed harder punches and more clean punches in at least 7 out of the rounds. calzaghe's little taps to the back, back of the head and shoulders don't count as scoring punches in boxing.

            Comment

            • seany1
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Nov 2008
              • 227
              • 10
              • 0
              • 6,281

              #66
              total punchstats you can get rite here on this site calzghe thrown 707 landed 232 hopkins thrown 468 landed 127 joe outlanded on power punches aswell but as you say every1 in media , boxing critics , boxers , judges all were wrong that calzghe won LMFAO

              Comment

              • daggum
                All time great
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 43451
                • 4,549
                • 3
                • 166,270

                #67
                Originally posted by seany1
                total punchstats you can get rite here on this site calzghe thrown 707 landed 232 hopkins thrown 468 landed 127 joe outlanded on power punches aswell but as you say every1 in media , boxing critics , boxers , judges all were wrong that calzghe won LMFAO
                those have proven inaccurate though. watch the videos. please feel free to make your own videos where it shows calzaghe's 232 landed punches. you can't because they don't exist. the numbers were flat out wrong by a huge margin. do you want to continue to cling to faulty numbers or do you want to know what really happened? i have a feeling it's the former.
                Last edited by daggum; 12-19-2010, 05:10 AM.

                Comment

                • Grimmer
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2008
                  • 4271
                  • 300
                  • 354
                  • 10,636

                  #68
                  "All Pascal did was knock Hopkins down"

                  "All Hopkins did was knock Calzaghe down"

                  Same point in both cases. Hopkins despite being knocked down won that fight tonight. Calzaghe despite being knocked down by Hopkins, won that fight.

                  Comment

                  • seany1
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 227
                    • 10
                    • 0
                    • 6,281

                    #69
                    can u tell me why such a hard man like hopkins wasnt walking through calzaghes lovetaps then hmmm ?????????

                    Comment

                    • daggum
                      All time great
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 43451
                      • 4,549
                      • 3
                      • 166,270

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Alan Partridge
                      "All Pascal did was knock Hopkins down"

                      "All Hopkins did was knock Calzaghe down"

                      Same point in both cases. Hopkins despite being knocked down won that fight tonight. Calzaghe despite being knocked down by Hopkins, won that fight.
                      based on what?

                      studdering calzaghe "ba ba ba because i threw more!"

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP