So does this make Joe Calzaghe's win over Hopkins look even better?

[Who are you?]

Jesus Christ y'all are on drugs

NEWSFLASH:

JOE OUTLANDED BERNARD 2-TO-1
JOE OUTTHREW BERNARD 2-TO-1

These are literal, not approximations.

You ***cannot*** win a fight, by not throwing punches, and not landing punches.

In both respects Joe was by far the better fighter.

Bernard was too slow for Joe. End of discussion.

Joe whooped his ass I didn't even think it was a close fight to be honest.

PS) Joe won the fight in USA against Bernard. So it was Bernard's homecountry. Had the fight been anywhere else it would have been a Unanimous Decision.

[seany1]

i have a tremendous work rate but no skill apparently. can't convince anyone from the uk that calzaghe actually lost even with video evidence. since you guys like football what if 1 team scored 5 goals and the other scored 1 goal and the team that scored 1 was declared the winner. would that be fair? would you say the team that scored 1 goal deserved to win because they ran around more and took more shots? the other team scored more!

i'm british but i had hopkins beating calzaghe that night..... also i don't understand why joe has got away with his slappy punching for so long, recently seen degale being warned to punch correctly.

joe fought a bunch of tomato cans up until he fought jeff lacy (another tomato can lol)

. Hopkins got beat twice off jermain Taylor who has been proven a tomato can numerous times but then again Hopkins was robbed them fights aswell ehh

[seany1]

that is very childish. we all know bad decisions happen all the time in boxing. looking at someone's record doesn't mean much it just promotes ignorance. i think hopkins won and you think calzaghe won. i think hopkins won because he landed the better punches in more rounds than calzaghe. you think calzaghe won because you like him a lot. reasonable!

I don't like calzaghe a lot but I know he's a great boxer and you of all people saying I'm childish gtfoh u were one bumping your gums earlier about Joe on strictly come dancing and saying all kinds of childish dribble

[daggum]

U need to convince the boxing critics and commentators aswell and fellow boxers cris Byrd and Johnson coz they had there fellow countryman losing too

well i can guarantee you any non biased person who watches the videos i posted would change their mind. it's hard to see what's really happening when you sit ringside or if you aren't paying attention fully. some people got it wrong. no shame. let me guess you haven't watched the videos yet but continue to defend calzaghe? wouldn't you at least like to see the truth? you would probably be less inclined to defend him then so yea better stay away.

[seany1]

well i can guarantee you any non biased person who watches the videos i posted would change their mind. it's hard to see what's really happening when you sit ringside or if you aren't paying attention fully. some people got it wrong. no shame. let me guess you haven't watched the videos yet but continue to defend calzaghe? wouldn't you at least like to see the truth? you would probably be less inclined to defend him then so yea better stay away.

I have seen the fight twice before and had calzaghe winning by 2 rounds do I don't need to watch it again it's not a good fight

[daggum]

Jesus Christ y'all are on drugs

NEWSFLASH:

JOE OUTLANDED BERNARD 2-TO-1
JOE OUTTHREW BERNARD 2-TO-1

These are literal, not approximations.

You ***cannot*** win a fight, by not throwing punches, and not landing punches.

In both respects Joe was by far the better fighter.

Bernard was too slow for Joe. End of discussion.

Joe whooped his ass I didn't even think it was a close fight to be honest.

PS) Joe won the fight in USA against Bernard. So it was Bernard's homecountry. Had the fight been anywhere else it would have been a Unanimous Decision.

not accurate at all. we've already gone over this. why post stats that have been disproven? you say you can't win a fight without landing punches yet you say calzaghe whooped his ass? do you know what happened in this fight? do you know which guy is calzaghe and which guy is hopkins? what you think happened did not happen. what you thought calzaghe was landing was not landing i can assure you.

[daggum]

I don't like calzaghe a lot but I know he's a great boxer and you of all people saying I'm childish gtfoh u were one bumping your gums earlier about Joe on strictly come dancing and saying all kinds of childish dribble

why do you keep defending a guy and you won't even watch the videos i posted? seems like you like him a lot to me. you don't want to shatter the illusion of perfection he has created so you won't watch the videos. in your mind you want him to be perfect. always.

[seany1]

why do you keep defending a guy and you won't even watch the videos i posted? seems like you like him a lot to me. you don't want to shatter the illusion of perfection he has created so you won't watch the videos. in your mind you want him to be perfect. always.

Funny that coz I thought Robin Reid beat calzaghe

[SirTomJones]

i have a tremendous work rate but no skill apparently. can't convince anyone from the uk that calzaghe actually lost even with video evidence. since you guys like football what if 1 team scored 5 goals and the other scored 1 goal and the team that scored 1 was declared the winner. would that be fair? would you say the team that scored 1 goal deserved to win because they ran around more and took more shots? the other team scored more!

There are some Brits who gaved Hopkins the nod and some who gave Calzaghe the nod. It split people in the US too.


Out of interest which boxers do you like? I have only seen you hate on boxers.

[daggum]

I have seen the fight twice before and had calzaghe winning by 2 rounds do I don't need to watch it again it's not a good fight

yes but did you watch closely? obviously you didn't. the videos i posted help people who don't watch where punches land.you can see calzaghe is not landing and hopkins is countering him over and over again if you watch the videos i posted.