Would you consider Shane Mosley an ATG?

**CarlosG815** · 12-15-2010, 06:28 PM

Originally posted by esconore

If so where would you place him, if not, why doesn't he belong?

Based on his resume, style, and the way he wins fights, yes he is.

However, he is a known cheater and that casts a huge black cloud over his career and his achievements and that is a good case to say "no, he is not an ATG, but a cheat."

On the flypside, we do not know how many people he fought who were on PED's as well, as they never test positive, as there are so many ways around it.

**The_Demon** · 12-15-2010, 06:30 PM

Ye just about

**DR.ORGYY** · 12-15-2010, 06:34 PM

Yes..................

**Heru** · 12-15-2010, 06:38 PM

Top 50? Not quite.

If he beats this version of Pacquiao, he might make the jump into top 40 status. I doubt he can.

**Earl-Hickey** · 12-15-2010, 06:42 PM

No, he's a hall of famer though.

He loses to pretty well any slick, skilled boxer.

**Nopartyforyou** · 12-15-2010, 06:45 PM

You gotta be kidding me, hell no.

He would be lucky if he made the HOF after his steroid use.

**DET. IRONSIDE** · 12-15-2010, 06:46 PM

Below Hopkins.

**Dan...** · 12-15-2010, 06:49 PM

Shane is definitely a HOFer. He is also definitely not an ATG in my view.

**Light_Speed** · 12-15-2010, 06:50 PM

He's not an ATG but he's definitely a HOFer.

Would you consider Shane Mosley an ATG?