Yesterday's boxers (pre-1980) would not be competitive today

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ThePrince
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 5877
    • 364
    • 49
    • 12,832

    #11
    Yes, and every boxer out there today would be automatically great if they fought before 1980. Chris Arreola would be considered GOAT HW.

    What a ****** blanket statement by the OP. There are certain fighters, including some doing it now, who would be great in any era.

    Comment

    • infamous larryx
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 10881
      • 512
      • 265
      • 1,565

      #12
      you said old fighters if they fought today wouldnt be competitive??wouldnt they be able to use the same supplements if they fought today???..plus supplements doent suplement skill man..plus they had to train harder then cause they fought more rounds

      Comment

      • mariobrotherpr
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 1550
        • 56
        • 66
        • 7,700

        #13
        1500 meters freestyle (swimming)

        1960's record: 16:04.5 - Michael Burton, USA (1969)
        1980's record: 14:54.76 - Vladimir Salnikov, Soviet Union (1983)
        1990's record: 14:41.66 - Kieren Perkins, Australia (1994)
        2000's record: 14:34.56 - Grant Hackett, Australia (2001)

        Comment

        • mariobrotherpr
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2010
          • 1550
          • 56
          • 66
          • 7,700

          #14
          Originally posted by ThePrince
          Yes, and every boxer out there today would be automatically great if they fought before 1980. Chris Arreola would be considered GOAT HW.

          What a ****** blanket statement by the OP. There are certain fighters, including some doing it now, who would be great in any era.
          What I said does not imply that, unless you refer to some weird Time Machine argument.

          Comment

          • Joeyzagz
            Soir
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2006
            • 6253
            • 569
            • 567
            • 16,120

            #15
            Originally posted by mariobrotherpr
            So that means modern training and nutrition has not helped modern athletes, incluiding boxers, become stronger, faster, with more stamina, than yesterday's athletes.
            Your title reads: Pre 1980s athletes would not be competitive today.

            THats idiotic in itself.

            Now you are bringing up modern nutrition and training? Joe Louis would beat both Klitschkos without modern training, if he had that stuff, hed finish both even faster. You are killing your own argument.

            Comment

            • jrosales13
              undisputed champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2008
              • 32632
              • 739
              • 763
              • 40,023

              #16
              So Alexis Arguello would not dominate the 130 division today?

              Who at 130 would beat him?

              Comment

              • mariobrotherpr
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2010
                • 1550
                • 56
                • 66
                • 7,700

                #17
                Originally posted by ThePrince
                Yes, and every boxer out there today would be automatically great if they fought before 1980. Chris Arreola would be considered GOAT HW.

                What a ****** blanket statement by the OP. There are certain fighters, including some doing it now, who would be great in any era.
                And if you read post #2, you'll see it is not a "blanket statement", as I said defensive wizards stand a chance.

                Defensive wizards that are also genetic freaks (Wilfred Benítez) stand a chance also.

                Comment

                • B.U.R.N.E.R
                  ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 30197
                  • 1,346
                  • 400
                  • 47,475

                  #18
                  Goodness where are the mods? Close this trash.

                  Comment

                  • mariobrotherpr
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 1550
                    • 56
                    • 66
                    • 7,700

                    #19
                    Originally posted by JoeyZagz
                    Your title reads: Pre 1980s athletes would not be competitive today.

                    THats idiotic in itself.

                    Now you are bringing up modern nutrition and training? Joe Louis would beat both Klitschkos without modern training, if he had that stuff, hed finish both even faster. You are killing your own argument.
                    Maybe, but Joe Louis never had modern training. We'll never know. I said the same thing about Ali.

                    Comment

                    • jrosales13
                      undisputed champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 32632
                      • 739
                      • 763
                      • 40,023

                      #20
                      Originally posted by mariobrotherpr
                      And if you read post #2, you'll see it is not a "blanket statement", as I said defensive wizards stand a chance.

                      Defensive wizards that are also genetic freaks (Wilfred Benítez) stand a chance also.
                      Of course

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP