Comments Thread For: Koncz Explains Why Pacquiao Asked For Catch-Weights

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sidespina
    Amateur
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Jun 2009
    • 29
    • 1
    • 0
    • 6,038

    #61
    Originally posted by LilGizmo562
    Would be closer, but the numbers don't lie, I can honestly give a **** less how much a boxer makes, but by the logic of some posters here, Floyd does deserve more am I not right?
    Sorry, was busy laughing at LeadUpperCut's ******* aneurysm. Yes, I agree, since Floyd is slightly more a draw, he should get slightly more than Pacquiao in negotiations. A few percentage points higher, a few drops of blood, all the urine he wants, for instance.

    Comment

    • DocG
      Kalaban ng Abu Sayyaf
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Mar 2008
      • 584
      • 19
      • 16
      • 6,690

      #62
      Originally posted by fabie
      it is there to level the playing field when the heavier fighter fights a smaller fighter. all catchweights are agreed upon...end of story.
      damn right!!!

      Comment

      • Apple Mac
        Up and Comer
        • Nov 2010
        • 71
        • 3
        • 25
        • 6,093

        #63
        Originally posted by fabie
        It is there to level the playing field when the heavier fighter fights a smaller fighter. All catchweights are agreed upon...end of story.
        If you are a ******* or a *****, IDK, but yes i agree with you here. Opposing team can always say no if they think the offer is unfair on their part. Youre the only one who's making sense here.


        Comment

        • LilGizmo562
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2008
          • 1675
          • 43
          • 149
          • 1,957

          #64
          Originally posted by sidespina
          Sorry, was busy laughing at LeadUpperCut's ******* aneurysm. Yes, I agree, since Floyd is slightly more a draw, he should get slightly more than Pacquiao in negotiations. A few percentage points higher, a few drops of blood, all the urine he wants, for instance.
          Fair enough, now the other guy needs to understand why I asked him in the first place.

          Comment

          • LeadUppercut
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2010
            • 13387
            • 305
            • 869
            • 13,720

            #65
            Originally posted by fabie
            It is there to level the playing field when the heavier fighter fights a smaller fighter. All catchweights are agreed upon...end of story.
            Rubbish.

            There should be no such thing as a catch-weight fight.

            They should be completely abolished. Any type of event/bout that takes place at catch-weight, should be officially classified as an exhibition match, and should not be sanctioned by the ABC bodies.

            There are only two reasons to demand a catch-weight.....

            1.) you are not good enough to compete with that fighter at his natural weight, which deems the bout an exhibition match and should therefore not be sanctioned

            2.) you are attempting to drain him to gain an unfair advantage

            Comment

            • LeadUppercut
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2010
              • 13387
              • 305
              • 869
              • 13,720

              #66
              Originally posted by LilGizmo562
              Fair enough, now the other guy needs to understand why I asked him in the first place.
              That spina clown missed the point as well.

              How diplomatic you were.

              Comment

              • mikemurni
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Sep 2006
                • 2057
                • 50
                • 0
                • 8,401

                #67
                Originally posted by LeadUppercut
                Rubbish.

                There should be no such thing as a catch-weight fight.

                They should be completely abolished. Any type of event/bout that takes place at catch-weight, should be officially classified as an exhibition match, and should not be sanctioned by the ABC bodies.

                There are only two reasons to demand a catch-weight.....

                1.) you are not good enough to compete with that fighter at his natural weight, which deems the bout an exhibition match and should therefore not be sanctioned

                2.) you are attempting to drain him to gain an unfair advantage

                I agree that sanctioning body for catchweight fights should prohibit it from being a title fight.. But abolishing catchweights is ******.. Its been part of the sport ever since.. Attempting to drain? Outside of DLH, who were the other fighters that were drained in the catchweight that Pac fought in a catchweight..
                Last edited by mikemurni; 12-08-2010, 03:52 AM.

                Comment

                • DocG
                  Kalaban ng Abu Sayyaf
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 584
                  • 19
                  • 16
                  • 6,690

                  #68
                  Originally posted by LeadUppercut
                  Rubbish.

                  There should be no such thing as a catch-weight fight.

                  They should be completely abolished. Any type of event/bout that takes place at catch-weight, should be officially classified as an exhibition match, and should not be sanctioned by the ABC bodies.

                  There are only two reasons to demand a catch-weight.....

                  1.) you are not good enough to compete with that fighter at his natural weight, which deems the bout an exhibition match and should therefore not be sanctioned

                  2.) you are attempting to drain him to gain an unfair advantage
                  Cry all day and as long as you want.....nobody will follow you!"peeleft:

                  Comment

                  • LilGizmo562
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Oct 2008
                    • 1675
                    • 43
                    • 149
                    • 1,957

                    #69
                    Originally posted by LeadUppercut
                    That spina clown missed the point as well.

                    How diplomatic you were.
                    True, but my question was originally directed to Jas-Jas.

                    Comment

                    • Apple Mac
                      Up and Comer
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 71
                      • 3
                      • 25
                      • 6,093

                      #70
                      Originally posted by LeadUppercut
                      Rubbish.

                      There should be no such thing as a catch-weight fight.

                      They should be completely abolished. Any type of event/bout that takes place at catch-weight, should be officially classified as an exhibition match, and should not be sanctioned by the ABC bodies.

                      There are only two reasons to demand a catch-weight.....

                      1.) you are not good enough to compete with that fighter at his natural weight, which deems the bout an exhibition match and should therefore not be sanctioned

                      2.) you are attempting to drain him to gain an unfair advantage
                      You're right man..
                      But all these suggestions of yours will only happen if you will become a part of the commission and I think you need to start giving your application now. But for now here's for you >>>

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP